civilisationReview

This is my current way of studying headphones Frequency Response Graphs. The first picture shows a comparison (from Headphone.com ) of the AKG K712 vs the K702. In that picture, we look at the zero line to determine the neutrality of the headphones, and the predominance of one frequency range over another, IN Relation to the zero line and IN Relation to each other. Is that accurate? Is there are a more accurate way of determining the quality of a headphones? I've been consi dering this for a while.... Hence, now I'm considering determining the quality or neutrality (neutral sound without anything being too emphasised) of headphones IN Relation to a resituated zero-line that is placed 3-4 dbr down from the highest point or plateau of the bass-midrange curve on the left. And then, from there, we see the relation of the rest of the frequencies TO the plateau. I illustrate it in the latter two pictures with my own 'zero' line. Of course, in this, we may not ...

So AKG has just released another pro headphones - before you click away because you might not be interested in headphones, this is about more than that, and applicable to just about most products you buy these days. Ok. First we have 'studio', then 'reference', then 'superior', now 'master' reference headphones. What next? 'Premium', 'emperor', 'king of the world', 'guardians of the galaxy', headphones. I really marvel at this sort of sales strategy as it is a monumental c on. Whenever improvements are made, the new headphones should just replace the older model, and sold for the SAME price as the older model. You know what I think. This is just a whole load of concrap. Like I was saying to a friend a couple of weeks ago - yes, I actually talk about such stuff in my offline life too now and then - when it comes to professional headphones, there is no need for higher and higher level or entry-level models. All...