civilisationReview

#SkewedNews   Fake news comes in so many forms.  The most insidious are the ones that impress upon you that the partial truth they present is the whole truth and nothing but the truth, because they'll pass any 'fact-checking' effort.  The problem with 'fact-checking' is that it just sees if the information you present is true, not if you've left out crucial information, or if you're playing with words.  For instance, the following by Facebook's 'facts' on the coronavirus is a good example how the Corporate Entertainment, News, and Social Media (CENSA) skews information and minds. Look at the contrasting information immediately below that.  Such contradictory information is widely availabe from university studies. According to Facebook's 'facts on the coronavirus', garlic does not 'prevent' or 'cure' the Chinavirus19.  Yes and no.  This is fake news, or what i would like to term for the sake of

" Exactly 100 days since the 6 January riot that saw a pro-Trump mob storm the US Capitol, prosecutors have their first guilty plea. Jon Schaffer, 53, a member of the Oath Keepers militia group, pleaded guilty to two charges - obstruction of an official proceeding and entering a restricted building with a dangerous weapon." - bbc How about sedition charges against, and arrest of, the leaders of the unelected #BigTech for silencing a popularly elected President? They, effectively, did worse than these protestors who stormed Capitol Hill.  The silencing of the President of the United States is no different from storming the Whitehouse to silence him.  It doesn't matter the means, what matters the result.   As long as the conspirators of Big Tech remain free, America is effectively under an ongoing State of Insurrection as their aims have not been overturned.  Congress ceases to represent the people of the United States the moment they remained sil

What did you come in here expecting to see?  An article about the Jewish Holocaust right? If the word,  Holocaust, brings to mind what the Jews went through in world war 2, then you're a racist, whatever your colour, clime, cuisine, or culture.  Or at the very least, conned by the Corporate News, Social, and Entertainment Media.....um, which still means you've been turned into a racist.  Or what Malcolm X would term, 'a house negro'. The fact of the matter is, There were different Holocausts.  During that time, the Jewish Holocaust was one, and the Colonial Holocaust was the other.  The Indian Holocaust, part of the Colonial Holocaust was spread over a longer time and led to more deaths under the British than the Jewish Holocaust, for example. And there was the African Holocaust through slavery, transport to European labour camps in the US, lynchings, and shootings, and even to the present day white police officers.  There was also the American Aboriginal

Logically, you can't claim that the life you kill in the womb isn't a life if you champion the right to take its life. You could say that it hasn't fully matured into a child, and therefore can be killed. Similarly, you could kill a child for not having fully matured into an adult, or those whom are mentally partially developed, or even those whom are partially physically disabled as they too have not matured to their final state as 'normal' life. You could say that the child that is already born is a fully sentient being and therefore has a right to life. In which case, i can kill abortionists in their sleep as they are not in a fully sentient state. You could say that your sleep is a temporary condition as you are still mature enough to make decisions when awake. Similarly, a child in the womb is a 'temporary condition' and will be mature enough to make decision when out of uteral hibernation. You could say, 'my body my rules'. But

I'm all for the freedom to love without boundaries.   To the angel, it means to give unto your neighbour as you give unto your own.  It means to love those in need without a system-imposed opportunity cost that makes one unable to afford to give to your neighbour.  It means to be free to give till it works, as opposed to being systemically-impoverished and class-subjugated so that we have to stop giving because it hurts (our pockets).    In a society where we are thus free to love by giving our utmost to each other, our only constraint would be nature and the scarcity of resources, or the lack of technology and knowledge to make even more of nature, or not getting past our own self-absorbtion so that we can offer maximal therapeutic or supportive help to our neighbour, NOT, one sector hoarding resources, or steering human intellectual and spiritual progress in a direction that disables us from being able to do the above.  THAT, is the Freedom to Love without Limits, bou

I keep hearing americans, especially in recent years, since Trump took office, misusing such terms, and i'm gradually seeing others across the world following suit like good little ventriloquist dummies with Uncle Sam's hand shoved so far up their backsides that it tickles their tonsils.  It is a thoroughly americocentric or eurocentric definition, and illustrates the shift of both the left and right to the right in the west.  Something like marching left-right, left-right, on the right-side of the road.  So allow me to clarify...    1. Left is - where the people own all the means of production, have full and free elections, can through referendums throw out a government anytime, and the government itself is more of an administrative body rather than a 'ruling' one.  It's only restriction is that capitalism cannot be reinstated as freedom cannot make allowance for the return of slavery.   Supporting LGBT, Eurofeminism, etc, is not necessarily a part of 'being l