civilisationReview

The LGBT's use of the term 'bigotry', with reference to those who stand against their Sexual Consumerist movement is an effort to claim the heritage of the black civil rights movement by presenting their situation in the selfsame standing as the blacks and the victims of all other such racisms throughout the world. Such usage is an insult to those suffering racist discrimination throughout the world as it equates what victims of racism are going through with these Sexual Consumerists effort to normalise and popularise their fetishes and depravity.   Recognising their 'moral' right to use such a word with reference to the discrimination they suffer for their flaunting their psychosis or perversion publicly, is akin to any fetishist, be she into bestiality to incest, equating their 'suffering' or 'post traumatic stress disorder' at not being viewed as normal with people whom are discriminated against on the basis of their race.   That isn't PTSD, i

America isn't a monolithic unchanging phenomenon. It compromises different Americas who would view each other as foreigners if they weren't divided by time, or united and hoodwinked through the love of their kids and grandkids. If an american from the 40s was teleported to the present america, if it wasn't for recognizable landmarks, they'd be wondering which hellhole they landed in.  That is why i'm inclined to think, when americans give birth to kids, they are giving birth to foreigners, subversives.  That is especially so when we see such overt disrespect for elders, the old, the past, and so on, and promoted religiously by the Corporate News, Media, and Entertainment departments.  That is nothing but an effort to instill allegiance to the present, and a renunciation of the state as it was before they were born.  The only superficially unifying factor is patriotic observances and other such rituals and dinners.   You see, the fact of the matter is, th

Yes.  I'm a Gender-Fluid Man.  BUT, still a Man.  Just because i like dogs, doesn't mean i'm going to start pissing on lamposts and chasing postmen, which is as wonky as those LGBT who can't decide whether to piss with the toilet seat up or down because they will feel oppressed if they think they are forced to choose one over the other. But yes.  I'm gender-fluid, and have been since i was a child, when i looked at the women around me and liked their gentler, caring, nurturing, more reasonable, traits, and thought that they were good moral exemplars, and that i ought to incorporate their traits.  I thought the same when i watched Jesus of Nazereth, Spiderman, 6 million dollar man, Rajinikanth, Clint Eastwood, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Black people, Indian people, English People, Christians, Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, bluesmen, tamil musicians, Gandhi, my mother....... They were role models, moral exemplars, highlights of different aspects of my untapped potent

The 'community guidelines' censorship policies of Corporate Social Media can be summarised by the slogan, 'Power to those who Already Have it!'. By suppressing talk, and through that, thought, that criticises another group, or casts them as inferior, or undesirable, or of questionable virtue, they are suppressing scrutiny of those whom already have power and prominence. Yes, this rule also protects those whom are minority in power and prominence, but they gain nothing from that as they are already marginalised, and their marginalised status can never be undone without critique of the centre. So what if they are protected from insults and such from those whom are more prominent? What matters is that they can't question the standing and standards of those in power, and it is that which keeps them at the periphery daily, 24/7. THAT is what is hidden between the lines in the community guidelines. It is only those in the centre whom have most to gain from such 'c

  Simply put, one cannot judge another as morally inferior on Corporate Social Media.  So you cannot say that LGBT is morally inferior or you will be blocked.  BUT, the LGBT can imply the moral inferiority of all cultures of the world, all religions, and all institutions, that do not accept them as morally unquestionable.  The implication is simple.  You cannot judge western fetishes and indecency as 'morally inferior' because your standards are deemed to be morally inferior for that purpose.  So Facebook stating that you cannot judge another as morally inferior is basically another way of saying that all standards contrary to the new social movements of the west is morally inferior.  When they delete your post, block you, or ban you, they ARE saying that you are morally inferior.  So such rules are simply purposed to present the west, as it has been since the Colonial Holocaust where they murdered millions upon millions of our ancestors for power and profit, as beyond critique

  What's all this nonsense about 'hate speech' I think we need to take a step back and look at the current historical context wherein we are experiencing what is construed as 'hate speech'. A person on his own will have his own ideas.  And he will continue to think it fine till he encounters another from another clime with his own ideas.  At this point, when they meet, they can have opposing ways of seeing and doing things.  What can happen then is that the deem all criticism from each other as 'hate speech', or learn from what they other had learnt in his unique experience and take it as constructive criticism.  But now, constructive criticism is being taken as 'hate speech'.  Yes, there are some that can truly be deemed to be hate speech, like a person calling for the death of another race of people.  But are they to be the excuse to silence all constructive criticism because it can fuel the view that an other ought to be exterminated?  All this is

  "Gab is an American alt-tech social networking service known for its far-right userbase.[8] Widely described as a haven for extremists including neo-Nazis, white supremacists, white nationalists, the alt-right, and QAnon conspiracy theorists,[12] it has attracted users and groups who have been banned from other social media and users seeking alternatives to mainstream social media platforms.[22]  Gab says it promotes free speech, individual liberty, and "the free flow of information online", though these statements have been criticized as being a shield for its alt-right and extremist ecosystem.[25] Antisemitism is prominent in the site's content, and the company itself has engaged in antisemitic commentary on Twitter.[27][32] Researchers note that Gab has been "repeatedly linked to radicalization leading to real-world violent events".[33]" - wiki Did i just say, 'right-wing media's attack on Gab.com'???  Oh deary.   Well, yes, but no, bu

  What these LGBTophiles don't realise is, if someone turns to you tomorrow and says they want to fuck their parents and siblings, what are you going to say?  It's wrong?   All they need to say to justify it is, 'it's the freedom to love!', and we are 'consenting adults'.  What are LGBTophiles going to say then?  After all, the whole ethos of these Sexual Consumerists is predicated on that isn't it. LGBT have already validated all perversions as alright with such a criteria.  They have thus validated adultery, the demise of the marital institution, marital or relational fidelity, all for the sake of going about being free to stick your pole into any hole and vice versa.  It is in this that we conclude that the LGBT are depraved, debauched, and degenerate, not for what they do, but for actually having the bally cheek to promote it as normal, even to children!  And this is when they have crossed the line, and which requires opposing them by any means neces