God Bless, uh, Which America?
America isn't a monolithic unchanging phenomenon. It compromises different Americas who would view each other as foreigners if they weren't divided by time, or united and hoodwinked through the love of their kids and grandkids.
If an american from the 40s was teleported to the present america, if it wasn't for recognizable landmarks, they'd be wondering which hellhole they landed in. That is why i'm inclined to think, when americans give birth to kids, they are giving birth to foreigners, subversives.
That is especially so when we see such overt disrespect for elders, the old, the past, and so on, and promoted religiously by the Corporate News, Media, and Entertainment departments. That is nothing but an effort to instill allegiance to the present, and a renunciation of the state as it was before they were born. The only superficially unifying factor is patriotic observances and other such rituals and dinners.
You see, the fact of the matter is, the only thing people own is the past. Not the present. The present is owned by the Corporation's desire for profit which requires getting people to toss aside that which is sold to them the day before. So the past is a landfill, and the people of the past are its scavengers who listen to old tunes, collect records, and other such 'memorabillia' that might be found in the garbage pit of western civilisation.
Many a time, in american 'entertainment' (indoctrination, propaganda), you can see older people talking about some past musician, and the younger ones actually laugh because the older people are talking about musicians the young know nothing about. The more the older person mentions things the young know nothing about, the more the older are presented as the stupid ones? I often wondered why people in the west don't find this, well, insane. How is ignorance used as a standard to determine quality? How are they bringing up their kids, and failing to bring them up, that leads the young and stupid to think the older are stupid for not keeping up with the times whilst they know nothing about the times past? And the 'adults' in these shows let it pass, or seem embarrassed even. Shouldn't it be the other way round? Logically speaking.
(one has to wonder after the Hollywood Jewish agenda - not with reference to ALL Jews, just Hollywood ones - as they are controlling Hollywood. The fact that there are some things that they ban, indicates an agenda when it comes to what they DO approve.)
And that is why there are different americas. One is the past, and the other the present. That is not to say that the present is equivalent to the present in the past, or that the young in the past were as stupid as the young in the present. No. The young in the past were reared by elders. The elders decided what music and movies had to be produced. But with the growing affluence of the young and the clueless, the young became the main market force.
I wouldn't say that that means that the young determine what ought to be produced. It just means that the Corporate News, Media, and Entertainment departments can now determine what ought to be produced as the young will have no adult standards to judge anything given their ignorance of the past and rejection of elders.
Hence, the young in the present are raised by the corporation and their own age-group through Corporate Social Media where ignorants congregate and give each other a pat on the back for their mutual ignorance of everything that isn't of the present. These idiots forget that the present is always a tiny part of time compared to the past that is almost all of it. In every hour, the present is only one second of that hour you know.
No no. I'm not one of those retards who thinks that people should have unquestioning respect and allegiance to the past and its traditions. If there is one thing we can be certain of, is the certainty of the fallibility of humanity. He who wants to perpetuate the respect of the past does so only because he wants to continue to gain from the oversights of the past, or is used to compensating for it through the culture that has been produced to put up with it.
Hence, everything should be evaluated objectively for its empathetic, intellectual, and spiritual value. But what i'm talking about here is a complete and utter disregard of the past simply because it is of the past. One needs to look at the present and ask if it is a progression from the best aspects of the past, or a movement in disrespect of all that is of the past simply because it is of the past.
All of human history has to-date been a history of the inquiry into and conflict between right and wrong. The america of the present wants to end that conflict by getting rid of the idea of right and wrong itself, and that in itself gives monopoly to 'wrong' to proceed with impunity. How 'america' is that?
[aside: Admittedly, America may not be such a good example in this respect as they have shown many a time in the past that 'right' is just a case of whether you get away with doing wrong. It's not unlike the Chinese who go by the Mandate of Heaven where one's success in a venture determines whether the venture is a good one or not, and not whether the venture is good or bad in itself. But that in itself is interesting isn't it. If the movements of America-present, like LGBT, Pro-kill-babies-in-the-womb, amongst others are of america-past, it is of this aspect of America in the past where self-interest is paramount and all victims of its pursuit are just 'collateral damage'. So yes, in this respect, there is a line connecting the past to the present in America.]
It is that which makes the young of today the foreigners of the morrow and the means by which the future is corrupted. And these are the new Americans? No. These are the insurrectionists who are constantly bringing about a new America based on the ignorance of the past. Their allegiance to the flag and whatnot is in effect an effort to claim it for themselves and fuck the rest of you. That is why, for instance, some come up with a 'rainbow' version of it. Sometimes it can be good, as when the american flag was reimagined with a CND logo as that was an anti-Corporate move. But now, it isn't.
But why isn't there a consciousness of this problem in America, or throughout the world for that matter? The Unconditional love of parents and grandparents is akin to unconditional acceptance of all the corporate rubbish that their children and grandchildren are incorporated into. They have some shared interest in the past, like worshipping the flag, or Thanksgiving dinners and whatnot, but that isn't a shared interest really. More like the young being Thankful that their parents and grandparents have been kicked out of the present which the Corporation owns through the young.
sum
I wonder what James Cagney would say to the debauched america of the 60s, or the depraved america of today, with its mascufeminised penis-envy-gone-mad 'women', 'non-binary' and lgbt crackpots, its gore loving psychoshites, Lady Gaga as opposed to Peggy Lee and Billie Holiday, amongst others? How truly foreign is that newly naturalised turburned NYC cab driver compared to those LGBT and Pro-let's kill-babies-to-feel-free-placard totting dung-brained 'americans' of today.
I'll tell you how Cagney would feel. He would feel like Heston after that 'oh God nooooo!' trip to the beach, and answered many of these so-called american-born americans, and what passes for their 'culture' of today, as he rightly ought, with a well-directed grapefruit.
edX
Comments
Post a Comment