civilisationReview

...because,  1. It impresses upon non-white people that whites do not know it all and that their own cultures can contribute and produce ideas that did not, and will not, be produced by them.  2. Such ideas will free white people from the tyranny of the particular kind of ignorance in perspectives and engendered by their unique history as they will be able to them access ideas and perspectives from other cultures.  3. Such access will disable their own white elite from capitalising on such ignorance which such elite may actually have produced, thrived on, and which thus gives them every reason to perpetuate.  Every culture that has an evil and exploitative elite will logically have cultural practices and perspectives that allows such an evil elite to exist in the first place.   Differences in historical experiences will give rise to different ways of putting up with it, supporting it, and contending with it.  It is from attentio...

It's pretty bally pointless philosophising, or reasoning, or moralising with people at present, especially those in east asia and the White northern hemisphere and those within their Mephistophelean influential auspices. To do so would require people to have, intact, their natural born instinct for the value of their lives and at the very least, their closest and dearest.  But when even that is absent, to moralise with them requires one to espouse the significance of the value of life itself!  Even animals don't require that for goodness sakes. It's fruitless to begin with proselytising on the value of life itself,  because to have to teach someone about the value of their own lives, and the lives of their closest, means they already don't value it, and that can only be if they have completely lost their humanity and a significant part of their sentience itself, which places them lower than animal and plant life.  They are already diminished in humanit...

We are exiting Humanity and entering the Soylent Age.  There is no stopping it. Thine enemy, if not thee, is beside, bedside, with even the copper being guilty of aiding genocide.  Let me put it simply, in world war 2, the whites rose up to fight against an evil of their making.   The Nazi and Japanese war machine were a direct corollary of western white supremacist colonial capitalist imperialism - if you care to read enough history.  So in putting down the Nazis, they countered the growing very-much-Nazi-colonial-white-supremacist evil amongst them,  which had inevitably given birth to the evil they fought.   In this action against the German Nazis, they sort of did a semi soul-search and were re-humanised to a significant degree.  They certainly couldn't fight an evil whilst being its twin could they.  They didn't fight the nazis to liberate those slavs, poles, romani, jews, amongst others,  in racist white supremacis...

The logical protocol should be, people who are NOT injected can carry on with life a usual. Those whom are fearful can stay home,  wear masks, await the vaccine, and wash their hands incessantly.  Strengthening the immune system naturally should be preferred as that is how humanity developed a strong immune system in the first place, as proven by growth in population since Adam and Eve,while long-term effects of Western 'vaccines' are not known.  Doing otherwise can create more problems than it solves, and most importantly, expecting people to inject themselves enables evil doers an uncheckable means to make people ill for profit, to killing for an agenda.   All other considerations are irrelevant to this bottom line.  Amen. edX

Mass Murder Inc. Doctors administering these 'death lottery' injections aren't doctors in the true essence of the word but murderers  Any scientist knows his job is to prove or disprove causation, NOT state that since there isn't hard proof that A caused B, that it didn't.   Logically, if there isn't hard proof that A caused B, that is itself hard proof that it COULD have.  And on THAT basis alone, if people are still coerced in ANY form,  that is, technically, premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder. People must have lost all self-respect, value for life, and empathy, to NOT even realise the above and defend themselves by ANY means necessary to stop this immediately, BUT instead view it as nothing but an 'infringement on bodily autonomy' civil issue.  It isn't.   It is outright rape and murder as all those imposing this throughout the world know full well that a percentage of EVERY man woman child and unborn WILL die ...

Tammy :  Off topic...I am unvaxed 60 yr old woman...partner 70 yr old man..both positive for covid...does anyone have the natural protocol for fighting it..thanks. ZS :  By Dr. Peter McCullough -  Take 1/2 tsp Dilute Povidone-Iodine mix in a shot glass 1.5 oz of water, squirt up nose, sniff back to the back of the throat and spit out.  Do twice in each nostril, then gargle with the rest for 30 sec. Do not swallow. If iodine allergic or intolerant, substitute with hydrogen peroxide. ed :  By Indian McCurry - Have a curry daily, and when afflicted with flu, aka, covid, aka flu, chop a raw garlic clove and have it with water. Not more than 3 times a day. Or people can opt to confuse the pharma for Eden. I can tell the difference though. Peter McCull, and people in the west, needs to get out to the world more and stop trying to make a Happy Meal out of their murderous white supremacist profiteering pharma.  And people in th...

I never thought I'd see the day when the following observation would be well-deserved with regards to the UK... Get a cardboard box then. What's with all the 'keeping up appearances'. Dignity is in how you lived your life.   And considering how most of the Brits just supported the jab and turned a blind eye and apathetic cheek to how it was killing people, and how all the prior measures killed people, those with learning disabilities, and old folks, and how 'popup' jab centres are allowed to lure kids into jabbing outside schools, and Britons, their police, their courts, did and do nothing effective about this, i think even a cardboard box is overkill for such a people.   They lost enough respect for the Sanctity of Life, each other, and as a result lost their self-defence instinct that even their beloved pets have, that they can actually confuse premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder for an 'infringement on bodily autonomy...

Sometimes, i get real tired of white folk praising their antiVax heroes....peter mccologh, rfk, yeadon, malone, whatnot..... "Yeah right. He's been profitting by the millions from disregarding the world's multucultural sciences and pushing the pharma globally over other cultures.  AND,  he's been telling everyone to just do nothing but just hold placards in the face of premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder. He's either a corporate plant, or he's profitted too greatly and too white supremacist in order to realise all of the above. I only come here (free press, aka, alt-tech, site) for the information. White people are too full of themselves to be skeptical enough to be objective and see past the whites of their eyes, which is proven by the fact that this (scamdemic) has happened, and yet again it is affecting the whole world - like the previous colonialism, wars, terrorisms, cold wars, etc.  You people better stop your Eurocentric stupidity...

The reason why Britons, and americanos, fell, and still fall for all that corpcovidcrap is because of the underlying white supremacist notion of whitefolk that they are the greatest nation people race whatnot on the planet. Once one falls for bumdump like that, they will tend to believe that true evil only comes from elsewhere, and that even if the west is worse, it can't be as bad as elsewhere, and since it isn't as bad elsewhere as it is in the west, surely it can't be as bad as they think in Britain,  Shamerica and Ewerope. That is why whitefolk are constantly fed this buttblop decade after decade so that, century after century, so that... 1. they will not learn from others, 2. they will take whatever they are sold as the best, as they won't think there is anything better elsewhere, 3. they can be presented as role models for the world, and the world is thus turned away from their own historical and cultural and even more potent solutions, singers, a...

"Dear Mike, There is no covid.  What you are doing for all of us is incredible and appreciated, but please stop legitimizing this scam on the world. This has been the biggest gaslighting of humanity in history. In a true pandemic, we would see it with our own eyes. People would be falling dead in the streets. A real pandemic does not necessitate 24/7 campaigns to keep it in the forefront of minds.  This whole thing has been a seasonal flu, vilified and rebranded, along with continuous and relentless pushing of fear. It is the so called “protocols” that are killing people in hospitals (no one dies at home; the homeless remain unaffected) and the death shots that were intended to maim and kill, all along." For evil to have its way, it will have to manage reactions through the heroes of the opposition and direct the angst of the people down pointless paths.   I'm not saying that mike is a conscious co-conspirator, and I'm not saying he isn't....

Implying that Self-defence in the face of premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder is simply 'violence' is like saying that struggling and fighting in the face of a rapist is violence.   People who take that approach are aiding and abetting a crime, intentionally or otherwise... and are serving as the PR department for the perpetrators.   The Evils will have such plants everywhere, so they can do as they do and get away with it in the face of resistance rendered ineffective by such allegedly 'good guys'. Logically, Resistance to evil must be proportionately more than the force applied to effect the evil for it to be effectively resisted.  If it can be, but it isn't, it signals desensitisation to said evil and even assimilation to it.  That is when the evil is perceived as less than it quantifiably is.  That is when, for instance, what is incontrovertibly premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder is construed a...

By focusing on Boris flouting lockdown rules, they are accomplishing 3 things. 1, perpetuating the myth of the existence, or and, malignancy of the virus; 2, legitimising the insurrectionist, treasonus, and murderous lockdown; and 3, distracting people from the historically unprecedented heinous crime of mass premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder of Britons through injections via coercion. Have Britons NO sense of proportion, or justice, or the instinct of Self-defence, or respect for the Sanctity of Life, and therefore sanity or even an ounce of empathy and reason - the 2 pillars of democracy - to realise the above without a second thought? ed X

Fine. 1. As long as it can be proven beyond Reasonable Doubt that it is only the uninjected whom can spread the infection; produce killer variants; and that taking the injection will make it impossible for him to spread the infection or get infected by it.  And if all of the above can be proven beyond Reasonable Doubt, that means there is no reason for the individual to take it as those whom took it will be completely protected.  2. It must also be proven beyond Reasonable Doubt that this measure cannot kill or maim anyone as all lives are equal in value before the law and there is no reason for one to be subjected to possible harm or death to save another. To deny this is to subject the entire public this measure purports to protect to possible death to save their lives, which is a contradiction in terms, and which reveal such an exercise as heinous in nature by consequence, if not in intent, and may thus be deemed an Act of Terrorism requiring immediate acti...

So long as one person can die because of it, or one person can get sick despite taking it, saying it is 'safe and effective' and the 'benefits outweigh the risks' is the biggest misinformation of all.   Aren't lotteries sold with the encouraging, 'it could be you!' even if there is only one or a few top prizes?  How is this any different, except that there are much more 'winners' with the death lottery. If it is true that any ONE of EVERYone can die because of it, it is more of a Death Lottery than a Vaccine. This is evidenced by the risk of the former being more certainly quantifiable than the benefits of the latter. Hence, to coerce this is enforced enrollment in a death lottery and premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder. edX

It appears that if something is called a 'vaccine', it is excused if some, or even numerous, die after taking it. But if it is called a 'health supplement', and even one person dies, it is immediately banned, or people are warned, or it is suspended pending hard proof that it is not responsible. LIKE a health supplement, this 'vaccine' does not confer immunity; it MAY help in reducing the severity of illness; it does not stop transmission. But how it may be distinguished from the 'vaccine' is that... ... unlike a health supplement, it can carry a higher post-exposure risk of immediate death, delayed death, stroke, myocarditis, pericarditis, miscarriages, paralysis, blindness, blood clots, amputations, has been associated with worsening preexisting conditions, is able to inflict illness in the recipient that may then serve as the preexisting conditions that can be worsened by the 'covid' virus or other viruses or ailments, along ...

Actually, whatever 'virus' the tests detect, there is no proof that it is a malignant virus.  The fact that 99.x% of people are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic from the very beginning argues for, 1. This virus being a boogeyman that is blamed for deaths from 'preexisting conditions' when the preexisting conditions itself might be responsible for deaths, so as to get people to believe in a 'pandemic' and take injections that are for other purposes, OR, 2. that people develop immunity very quickly thus negating the need for injections or any restrictions. My take is that these tests are used BECAUSE they are inaccurate so as to not always detect a 'virus' that might be found in most people and has been the case for thousands of years perhaps.  If it was to be detected so the time, and everyone is fine, people will realise there isn't a pandemic. So, it is erratic in its results thus giving people the impression that they are either ...

No source of information can be taken as credible unless it can continously fend off all contradiction as that is the only means by which a source of information can be deemed to be credible. In other words, there is no such thing as an unquestionable source of information.  Any party that claims credibility and demonises contradiction, hence, immediately ceases to be credible as they are attempting to remove the only means by which they can be proven to be credible. In the scientific field, the word that is used is HYPOTHESIS not 'falsehood' or misinformation. Without hypothesis, there is no science.   Terming a hypothesis or contradiction as 'falsehood', 'misinformation', etc, is illogical and downright nonsensical as that disables the very engine that drives science forward. Finally, there is no such thing as 'silly conspiracy theories'.  All ideas and perspectives give us an opportunity to test our beliefs.   I'm curious about differe...

     (illustration: saurabh singh) Contact-tracing   Contact-tracing has a very low efficacy rate when it comes to preventing a epidemic because it only traces conscious contacts, or contacts one is aware of.  It does not trace unwitting contacts whom have contact with others through sitting at the same table, using the same escalator, using the same tap, holding the bars on the back of seats in buses, etc.  So unless a virus is transmitted only through prolonged face-to-face interaction, it is pretty much as efficacious as a rabbit's foot in the long-run. Contact-tracing, however, has the benefit of slowing down viral transmission, not eradicating it. That slows down the demands on medical facilities and should be implemented in the narrow window when one first gets wind of the virus, provided this is paired with other measures like physical-distancing, closing of borders, staying home, etc.  If not, Contact-tracing in itself becomes a...