What IS Really Happening? in brief

Actually, whatever 'virus' the tests detect, there is no proof that it is a malignant virus.  The fact that 99.x% of people are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic from the very beginning argues for,

1. This virus being a boogeyman that is blamed for deaths from 'preexisting conditions' when the preexisting conditions itself might be responsible for deaths, so as to get people to believe in a 'pandemic' and take injections that are for other purposes,

OR,

2. that people develop immunity very quickly thus negating the need for injections or any restrictions.

My take is that these tests are used BECAUSE they are inaccurate so as to not always detect a 'virus' that might be found in most people and has been the case for thousands of years perhaps.  If it was to be detected so the time, and everyone is fine, people will realise there isn't a pandemic. So, it is erratic in its results thus giving people the impression that they are either infected or might be infected soon because they are not infected yet.

The WHO guidelines for defining 'covid-deaths' is itself proof that they are trying to create a disease rather than defend us from one.

link

And the fact that they did not even check for antibodies t-cells, etc before jabbing people; 

ignore the fact that high rate of infections means a high rate of natural immunity being acquired; 

that natural immunity can last a lifetime vs 'vaccine' immunity being short-term; 

that they do not know the long-term consequences of the 'vaccine'; 

that they  do not know about the epigenetic effects of the injection, or are keeping silent about it;

that these injections were generally only trialled on healthy human beings with no medical psychological histories, tattoos on the site where the injection is to be administered, do not smoke, vape, etc; 

...is proof that they have completely discarded scientific protocols and science itself.
(read the inclusion and exclusion criteria of pfizer's test schedules on Clinicaltrials..... which is why India rejected pfizer)

link

Don't forget that there are scientific studies already done to show that many will develop all sorts of illnesses simply from wearing masks, and these can then be blamed on 'covid'.  Protracted use of masks will lead to blood-gas imbalances, blood toxicity and acidity, organ damage and cancer.  There is already a spike in dental problems from tooth decay to gingivitis and acne.  These are symptoms that can indicate ongoing damage in the bodies of most people.

link

'Masking up' is basically the 'new smoking'.  And it is being enforced. 

That can explain much of the 'covid' cases later, in addition to the long-term damages due to the injections.  That would also explain the rising cases amongst children in america whom have been wearing masks for a long while,, and which is now used to blame covid and justify injecting then with unknown substances. You could say that there is enough evidence to plausibly propose that the real pandemic is the injection and the mask.  And no doubt the deaths and illnesses from these can then be blamed on variants, etc.

And finally, if they want you to take the injection badly to disregard science,  scientific and ethical standards, human rights,  etc, don't be surprised if they infect you with the PCR etc tests.  That can explain why they are limiting testing to the uninjected in the future.

SUM

I don't need to supply hard proof that this is true. I just need to prove that there is an absence of proof that they WOULDN'T do it. 

That proof is supplied by the incontrovertible fact that they are threatening families with death through unemployment if their breadwinner is uninjected, AND,  their forcing people to take it even knowing that they can die from it. 

The fact that they are tyrannical enough to toss democracy aside completely in taking away people's choice to say no to this potential threat to their lives is proof that they are willing to kill to achieve their agenda.  And that serves as hard proof that if they are able to use one murderous means to achieve their agenda, they can use other means as well.

[ One cannot allege 'misinformation' in order to silence critique and contradiction as the only check against human error or deceit on the part of official bodies is critique and contradiction.   It is the people's duty to challenge all official bodies and it is the official bodies obligation to consider these and check on their findings.  That is the ONLY check to ensure that they are working for the interests of the people, and the ONLY way they can prove that they are worthy of retaining their employment.  To dismiss critique as 'misinformation' is a claim to infallibility and hence a claim to supremacy over the people whose will official bodies are supposed to be an extension of.  That is treason.]

Just as one can't force a person to NOT take an injection and risk death by acquiring immunity through exposure to a virus, similarly, one cannot force a person to risk death by taking an injection to acquire immunity. 

To still do it is tantamount to premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder and constitutes, by definition, Corporate-Media-Domestic pharmaterrorism.  The new Axis of Evil.

edX