civilisationReview

The 'community guidelines' censorship policies of Corporate Social Media can be summarised by the slogan, 'Power to those who Already Have it!'. By suppressing talk, and through that, thought, that criticises another group, or casts them as inferior, or undesirable, or of questionable virtue, they are suppressing scrutiny of those whom already have power and prominence. Yes, this rule also protects those whom are minority in power and prominence, but they gain nothing from that as they are already marginalised, and their marginalised status can never be undone without critique of the centre. So what if they are protected from insults and such from those whom are more prominent? What matters is that they can't question the standing and standards of those in power, and it is that which keeps them at the periphery daily, 24/7. THAT is what is hidden between the lines in the community guidelines. It is only those in the centre whom have most to gain from such 'c...

  Simply put, one cannot judge another as morally inferior on Corporate Social Media.  So you cannot say that LGBT is morally inferior or you will be blocked.  BUT, the LGBT can imply the moral inferiority of all cultures of the world, all religions, and all institutions, that do not accept them as morally unquestionable.  The implication is simple.  You cannot judge western fetishes and indecency as 'morally inferior' because your standards are deemed to be morally inferior for that purpose.  So Facebook stating that you cannot judge another as morally inferior is basically another way of saying that all standards contrary to the new social movements of the west is morally inferior.  When they delete your post, block you, or ban you, they ARE saying that you are morally inferior.  So such rules are simply purposed to present the west, as it has been since the Colonial Holocaust where they murdered millions upon millions of our ancestors for power...

Alt Social Media _______ Right on, right on. I've started publishing in Gab on my laptop.  Works fine.  It is Alternative Social Media, or an alternative to mainstream social media.   Yes, first we had Social Media.  Then the Corporate Fascists used it to promote and normalise their sociopolitical agenda and basically turned it into a tool of propaganda and a platform for corporate beliefs.  So it became a platform not for the people to express their views, but a platform where the Corporation could express their views through the people by ensuring only those that agreed with them stays on it.  So in other words, 'big tech' as they are increasingly being called, don't need to say a word on 'Social Media', they just have to ensure that only those who say what they think are allowed to keep their accounts.  So most of the people on Facebook, Twitter, etc, become the voice of the Corporate Fascists.  Corporate fascism and censorship, whilst ge...