civilisationReview

I did a video speaking about the possibility of the vaccine being used to deliver hazardous content, and that checks have to be put in place to ensure this can never be.   After all, it was for this reason that a scientific commission was set up by the UN to study the possibility of its misuse in 2017, with many scientists calling for a moratorium on this technology.  Why weren't they censored for 'medical misinformation' then? It appears that Big Tech can't stop the scientific community from talking about it,  but want to ensure that people don't talk about it.  That way, they can possibly take time to silence those in the scientific community whom don't agree with their agenda, and then finally present the findings of those scientists whom are towing the line as the only scientists that ought to be considered.  Through that, they can dictate popular thought on the matter. After all, isn't that what they did with the vaccine, adverse reactions...

The 'community guidelines' censorship policies of Corporate Social Media can be summarised by the slogan, 'Power to those who Already Have it!'. By suppressing talk, and through that, thought, that criticises another group, or casts them as inferior, or undesirable, or of questionable virtue, they are suppressing scrutiny of those whom already have power and prominence. Yes, this rule also protects those whom are minority in power and prominence, but they gain nothing from that as they are already marginalised, and their marginalised status can never be undone without critique of the centre. So what if they are protected from insults and such from those whom are more prominent? What matters is that they can't question the standing and standards of those in power, and it is that which keeps them at the periphery daily, 24/7. THAT is what is hidden between the lines in the community guidelines. It is only those in the centre whom have most to gain from such 'c...

Death rates in the west is about 10 to 15 times more than in lots of other states in the southern hemisphere. The western-predicted large death tolls in Africa and India never happened - as i predicted a short while after this event happened. While in Britain, they are saying that a disproportionately large number of blacks and asians are dying from it, the fact is, they are still a small number of the population, and it is largely the whites whom are dying, AND, the black population of Africa and the Indians in India aren't dying at anywhere near the rate white people are dying from it. SO, I'm wondering if we should all take the jab. I don't want to fall into a situation where the white man has a tummy ache, and i am required to take diarrhea medication - just like after 9/11, the white man expected the whole world to support them in fighting people whom they have been killing and antagonising for hundreds of years by saying, 'you're either with us or agains...

   Cultural hegemony and the West's Passive-Aggressive Bigotry Cultural hegemony doesn't need to fight for prominence or attention. They already have it due to historical factors affording them such a position. It is only those who stand up against it whom have no choice but to be vocal and vociferous. That is when western social media's 'community standards' will silence them for 'criticising another group' or 'saying another is morally inferior'. But the fact of the matter is, those with cultural hegemony don't need to criticise anyone. They don't need to say anyone is morally inferior. They can just promote what they like as 'normal', or the 'standard' and THEREFORE superior, and leave out all other standards and THUS imply their inferiority explicitly. For instance, the west doesn't need to actually go out and say that Indian standards are inferior. They can just promote white standards as superior; point t...

Alt Social Media _______ Right on, right on. I've started publishing in Gab on my laptop.  Works fine.  It is Alternative Social Media, or an alternative to mainstream social media.   Yes, first we had Social Media.  Then the Corporate Fascists used it to promote and normalise their sociopolitical agenda and basically turned it into a tool of propaganda and a platform for corporate beliefs.  So it became a platform not for the people to express their views, but a platform where the Corporation could express their views through the people by ensuring only those that agreed with them stays on it.  So in other words, 'big tech' as they are increasingly being called, don't need to say a word on 'Social Media', they just have to ensure that only those who say what they think are allowed to keep their accounts.  So most of the people on Facebook, Twitter, etc, become the voice of the Corporate Fascists.  Corporate fascism and censorship, whilst ge...