civilisationReview

So long as one person can die because of it, or one person can get sick despite taking it, saying it is 'safe and effective' and the 'benefits outweigh the risks' is the biggest misinformation of all.   Aren't lotteries sold with the encouraging, 'it could be you!' even if there is only one or a few top prizes?  How is this any different, except that there are much more 'winners' with the death lottery. If it is true that any ONE of EVERYone can die because of it, it is more of a Death Lottery than a Vaccine. This is evidenced by the risk of the former being more certainly quantifiable than the benefits of the latter. Hence, to coerce this is enforced enrollment in a death lottery and premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder. edX

What did you come in here expecting to see?  An article about the Jewish Holocaust right? If the word,  Holocaust, brings to mind what the Jews went through in world war 2, then you're a racist, whatever your colour, clime, cuisine, or culture.  Or at the very least, conned by the Corporate News, Social, and Entertainment Media.....um, which still means you've been turned into a racist.  Or what Malcolm X would term, 'a house negro'. The fact of the matter is, There were different Holocausts.  During that time, the Jewish Holocaust was one, and the Colonial Holocaust was the other.  The Indian Holocaust, part of the Colonial Holocaust was spread over a longer time and led to more deaths under the British than the Jewish Holocaust, for example. And there was the African Holocaust through slavery, transport to European labour camps in the US, lynchings, and shootings, and even to the present day white police officers.  There was also the Am...