civilisationReview

" Exactly 100 days since the 6 January riot that saw a pro-Trump mob storm the US Capitol, prosecutors have their first guilty plea. Jon Schaffer, 53, a member of the Oath Keepers militia group, pleaded guilty to two charges - obstruction of an official proceeding and entering a restricted building with a dangerous weapon." - bbc How about sedition charges against, and arrest of, the leaders of the unelected #BigTech for silencing a popularly elected President? They, effectively, did worse than these protestors who stormed Capitol Hill.  The silencing of the President of the United States is no different from storming the Whitehouse to silence him.  It doesn't matter the means, what matters the result.   As long as the conspirators of Big Tech remain free, America is effectively under an ongoing State of Insurrection as their aims have not been overturned.  Congress ceases to represent the people of the United States the moment they re...

  What's all this nonsense about 'hate speech' I think we need to take a step back and look at the current historical context wherein we are experiencing what is construed as 'hate speech'. A person on his own will have his own ideas.  And he will continue to think it fine till he encounters another from another clime with his own ideas.  At this point, when they meet, they can have opposing ways of seeing and doing things.  What can happen then is that the deem all criticism from each other as 'hate speech', or learn from what they other had learnt in his unique experience and take it as constructive criticism.  But now, constructive criticism is being taken as 'hate speech'.  Yes, there are some that can truly be deemed to be hate speech, like a person calling for the death of another race of people.  But are they to be the excuse to silence all constructive criticism because it can fuel the view that an other ought to be exterminated?  All this...