civilisationReview

I did a video speaking about the possibility of the vaccine being used to deliver hazardous content, and that checks have to be put in place to ensure this can never be.   After all, it was for this reason that a scientific commission was set up by the UN to study the possibility of its misuse in 2017, with many scientists calling for a moratorium on this technology.  Why weren't they censored for 'medical misinformation' then? It appears that Big Tech can't stop the scientific community from talking about it,  but want to ensure that people don't talk about it.  That way, they can possibly take time to silence those in the scientific community whom don't agree with their agenda, and then finally present the findings of those scientists whom are towing the line as the only scientists that ought to be considered.  Through that, they can dictate popular thought on the matter. After all, isn't that what they did with the vaccine, adverse reactions...

  What's all this nonsense about 'hate speech' I think we need to take a step back and look at the current historical context wherein we are experiencing what is construed as 'hate speech'. A person on his own will have his own ideas.  And he will continue to think it fine till he encounters another from another clime with his own ideas.  At this point, when they meet, they can have opposing ways of seeing and doing things.  What can happen then is that the deem all criticism from each other as 'hate speech', or learn from what they other had learnt in his unique experience and take it as constructive criticism.  But now, constructive criticism is being taken as 'hate speech'.  Yes, there are some that can truly be deemed to be hate speech, like a person calling for the death of another race of people.  But are they to be the excuse to silence all constructive criticism because it can fuel the view that an other ought to be exterminated?  All this...

Well, well, well. The pro-'Israel' FB has blocked my account yet again. Free speech to these 'people' is only allowed if it doesn't challenge their western dominance.  FB is basically a eurocentric/Jewish means to assimilate all the peoples of the world to their way of 'thinking'.  It is already being complemented religiously by the, again, Jewish-controlled Hollywood, and the people of the world are pretty much outflanked again, as they were during Direct Colonial times. The following comment of mine, is regarding 'two israeli missiles' striking an area near Damascus Airport.  I know that many post anti-'israeli' comments online, but i suspect that those who really argue their case with logic are the ones whom are deemed dangerous and hence kicked out.  This is not the first time for me.  And i'm certainly not being muzzled by these eurocentric jewish fascists either. If you think about it, the more people get on FB, the more the kicked...

The Islamic faith has not been allowed to evolve with more open or contemporary times. That's because western imperialism and its quest for cultural hegemony across the world incites a siege mentality amongst many, causing a polarisation and a self-defensive gravitation toward older norms and customs so as to distinguish and protect themselves from the west. And besides this, the west, and much of the incorporated world, refuses to acknowledge that a people's consciousness of themselves as one does not need to be limited to the borders of the nation-state. A nation does not only achieve corporeal form only when it has a seat in a United Nations that has not been structured to recognise nations that transcend borders.  People talk about India and China being the most populous nations on the planet, but fail to realise that Muslims are themselves a nation of similar numerousness.  Hence, the west does not understand how Muslims can empathise with each other as compatriots even t...