civilisationReview

Question: Is it possible that when one takes the RNA vaccine, whatever is produced within their bodies interact with the cv19 virus when they come into contact with it later to create a stronger variant that kills people whom have not taken the vaccine?   In other words, is the RNA vaccine actually creating more deadly strains when the vaccinated come into contact with the original virus?  If so, that might explain spikes in countries which had previously not been as afflicted.  These new variants may take a longer time to evolve under normal unvaccinated conditions, and which we can develop immunity to gradually without too negative a consequence because our immune systems can keep up with slower mutations.  But is the RNA vaccine speeding this up thus creating one wave after another and variants as well?  Why Ask? The point of asking these questions is to get around the Corporate media not asking anything that might compromise the ...

Do you remember when they said that the vaccine would NOT stop transmission? Then when  people started saying that therefore there was no need to take it, then the story changed to, "yes, it will decrease transmission by half." Alright, let's consider it then. So even if it stops transmission by half, if i get on board a plane with just 2 vaccinated people whom are also virus-carriers, they together still pose a 100% risk don't they.  So what about a flight with a few hundred passengers?  I stand a, say, 15 000%  chance instead of 30 000% chance of getting infected if everyone is vaccinated?  Is there really a difference between either when the percentage is bloody high both ways? And when you add that percentage chance to all the other people I'm going to meet, to walk past, to drink amongst, to shit and piss with, to take lifts with, cutting transmission chances from 1 million % (with non-vaccinated people) to half a millio...

According to the following quoted site, all humans can never develop sufficient antibodies to fight the chinavirus19, and need to get vaccinated all their lives, and that if anyone doesn't, they are guilty of spreading it.  First read what they have to say... *** from Factcheck : '' Olivier Schwartz, head of the Virus and Immunity Unit at the Pasteur Institute, told AFP by phone: “It is obvious that people under 50 who are in good health should be vaccinated” because they can still be affected by the disease. Bruno Lina, professor of virology at the University of Lyon, said that the aim of a mass vaccination campaign is to reduce the transmission of a virus. This would not be effective if only people over 50 years old received the vaccine. That is less than half the population, and “under these conditions, we will never slow down the circulation of the virus,” he said. Both Schwartz and Lina said that while the Covid-19 vaccines currently authorized canno...

BBC online : Facebook:  If the Khumb Mela started it, there should have been a death spike from January onwards as that is when the Khumb mela started. How is the western press ignoring this when they themselves reported it in January? Look at the date of the article below.   You'll see that it is dated 14th January, 2021.   The Guardian:  14th January 2021 Now unless, the incubation period for the chinavirus19 is a couple of months, the current viral death-spike should have been running concurrently from January. So.  What's going on? edX  

According to the CDC, nobody dies from the vaccine.  When you look at the following site, the whole thing reads like propaganda. NO Link between vaccine and deaths, is the continuous theme on the CDC site . cdc: ''To date, VAERS has not detected patterns in cause of death that would indicate a safety problem with COVID-19 vaccines.'' ed: If more than one person can die shortly after taking the vaccine, that IS a pattern.  And if there really isn't a 'pattern', that is a 'pattern' in itself that indicates that the vaccine can be indiscriminate in causing the deaths of people.  That would indicate that some component within the vaccine can interact differently with different people, their biology, their genetic makeup, or health conditions.  If a mass-shooter goes out and shoots people without any pattern, does that mean that he didn't kill anyone? When no pattern is detected, it can also mean that the formulae for detecting pat...

#SkewedNews   Fake news comes in so many forms.  The most insidious are the ones that impress upon you that the partial truth they present is the whole truth and nothing but the truth, because they'll pass any 'fact-checking' effort.  The problem with 'fact-checking' is that it just sees if the information you present is true, not if you've left out crucial information, or if you're playing with words.  For instance, the following by Facebook's 'facts' on the coronavirus is a good example how the Corporate Entertainment, News, and Social Media (CENSA) skews information and minds. Look at the contrasting information immediately below that.  Such contradictory information is widely availabe from university studies. According to Facebook's 'facts on the coronavirus', garlic does not 'prevent' or 'cure' the Chinavirus19.  Yes and no.  This is fake news, or what i would like to term for the sake of ...

Death rates in the west is about 10 to 15 times more than in lots of other states in the southern hemisphere. The western-predicted large death tolls in Africa and India never happened - as i predicted a short while after this event happened. While in Britain, they are saying that a disproportionately large number of blacks and asians are dying from it, the fact is, they are still a small number of the population, and it is largely the whites whom are dying, AND, the black population of Africa and the Indians in India aren't dying at anywhere near the rate white people are dying from it. SO, I'm wondering if we should all take the jab. I don't want to fall into a situation where the white man has a tummy ache, and i am required to take diarrhea medication - just like after 9/11, the white man expected the whole world to support them in fighting people whom they have been killing and antagonising for hundreds of years by saying, 'you're either with us or agains...

The BBC, and other 'news' sources, keep banging on about 'infections rates' with a doomsday focus on how it is rising here and there. It is times like this that gives me the uncomfortable notion that i might be one of the last surviving intelligent lifeforms on the planet. How is it that people are so easily led man? So the BBC keeps harping on how Africa, or India, are going past a million or so infection rates, as if that spells a resounding doom doom doom on the clock of life. What if i told you that they already hit 100 million 2 months ago? Wouldn't you then say, 'oh really? So many cases, and yet so few deaths?' So it is either that i am one of the few intelligent lifeforms left on the planet in a post-apocalyptic world where smartphones are frying to a frizzle lots of minds throughout the world every passing minute, not with its 4g or 5g or whatnot, but with the assimilation of all into a mainstream network of consumeristic nitwits, OR, t...