civilisationReview

Logically, you can't claim that the life you kill in the womb isn't a life if you champion the right to take its life. You could say that it hasn't fully matured into a child, and therefore can be killed. Similarly, you could kill a child for not having fully matured into an adult, or those whom are mentally partially developed, or even those whom are partially physically disabled as they too have not matured to their final state as 'normal' life. You could say that the child that is already born is a fully sentient being and therefore has a right to life. In which case, i can kill abortionists in their sleep as they are not in a fully sentient state. You could say that your sleep is a temporary condition as you are still mature enough to make decisions when awake. Similarly, a child in the womb is a 'temporary condition' and will be mature enough to make decision when out of uteral hibernation. You could say, 'my body my rules'. But...

God?  Oh God. Pregnancy is a gift from God. Every child is hope for humanity.  God wants you to take care of your child, love your child, nurture your child, etc, etc.     Well, i used to think so.   But not now.  Not as long as i have my commonsense intact.    There are many stillborns aren't there.  And there are others who die not too long after birth - like my mother, who lost, i think they were the first two or first and third - a Catherine and a Vincent shortly after birth.  Why?  God changed his mind?  And i had a dear chinese friend once, he got a son, loved his son lots, at the age of 6 or so, he died of Leukemia.  How does God expect humanity to nurture life when he treats it so carelessly?  So unless God's has a twisted sadistic sense of humour,  perhaps pregnancy, other than the immaculate conception, is just something that happens, and has fuck-all to do with God.  You can't call a chi...

Kamala Harris should do some thinking.  If her mum thought similarly, she might not be around to be a Vice President to this baby-killer.  She, or any woman, isn't a woman if she feels the need to sacrifice babies to prove she is free.   Abortion in the past was an action that women regretted, or did with regret, till Eurofeminism, armed with the modern western 'disposable consumerism' ethos (don't like it, toss it) came in to tell woman to celebrate it as evidence of being free, and which serves as a complement to also 'feeling free' to sleep around or have sex as an end in itself without consideration of consequence - frequently used to describe teenage attitudes in the past, but which is the norm now. If I was president of the US, i'd have all those women going for abortion arrested and sentenced to prison for attempted murder, including all those doctors and nurses, etc, whom were colluding in it.  If Parliament overrules me, I'd dissolve...

I was speaking to an 18 year old girl not too long ago on the matter of abortion, and she vehemently stated that abortion is alright before a heartbeat is detected as that is evidence that it isn't life. This is quite the popular argument amongst those advocating the murder of children in the west as the ultimate evidence and celebration of 'freedom' in the west, and their perverse arguments are becoming quite the trend amongst many of the young white worshippers of the world. These are a new breed of what i term #perverseprogressives. And we cannot let these people hijack the term 'progressive' or the idea of progress as the definition of progress is inextricably linked with the definition of what it means to be Human. W ell, Much of the arguments for sexual debauchery, aka, LGBT; infanticide, aka, 'Pro-choice'; Celebration of Death, Murder, and Promotion of Hatred for Humanity, aka, 'Horror' movies; Promoting Reaction over Int...