civilisationReview

  Simply put, one cannot judge another as morally inferior on Corporate Social Media.  So you cannot say that LGBT is morally inferior or you will be blocked.  BUT, the LGBT can imply the moral inferiority of all cultures of the world, all religions, and all institutions, that do not accept them as morally unquestionable.  The implication is simple.  You cannot judge western fetishes and indecency as 'morally inferior' because your standards are deemed to be morally inferior for that purpose.  So Facebook stating that you cannot judge another as morally inferior is basically another way of saying that all standards contrary to the new social movements of the west is morally inferior.  When they delete your post, block you, or ban you, they ARE saying that you are morally inferior.  So such rules are simply purposed to present the west, as it has been since the Colonial Holocaust where they murdered millions upon millions of our ancestors for power...

  What's all this nonsense about 'hate speech' I think we need to take a step back and look at the current historical context wherein we are experiencing what is construed as 'hate speech'. A person on his own will have his own ideas.  And he will continue to think it fine till he encounters another from another clime with his own ideas.  At this point, when they meet, they can have opposing ways of seeing and doing things.  What can happen then is that the deem all criticism from each other as 'hate speech', or learn from what they other had learnt in his unique experience and take it as constructive criticism.  But now, constructive criticism is being taken as 'hate speech'.  Yes, there are some that can truly be deemed to be hate speech, like a person calling for the death of another race of people.  But are they to be the excuse to silence all constructive criticism because it can fuel the view that an other ought to be exterminated?  All this...

  "Gab is an American alt-tech social networking service known for its far-right userbase.[8] Widely described as a haven for extremists including neo-Nazis, white supremacists, white nationalists, the alt-right, and QAnon conspiracy theorists,[12] it has attracted users and groups who have been banned from other social media and users seeking alternatives to mainstream social media platforms.[22]  Gab says it promotes free speech, individual liberty, and "the free flow of information online", though these statements have been criticized as being a shield for its alt-right and extremist ecosystem.[25] Antisemitism is prominent in the site's content, and the company itself has engaged in antisemitic commentary on Twitter.[27][32] Researchers note that Gab has been "repeatedly linked to radicalization leading to real-world violent events".[33]" - wiki Did i just say, 'right-wing media's attack on Gab.com'???  Oh deary.   Well, yes, but no, bu...