The Evil that is Corporate Social Media

 

"Gab is an American alt-tech social networking service known for its far-right userbase.[8] Widely described as a haven for extremists including neo-Nazis, white supremacists, white nationalists, the alt-right, and QAnon conspiracy theorists,[12] it has attracted users and groups who have been banned from other social media and users seeking alternatives to mainstream social media platforms.[22] 

Gab says it promotes free speech, individual liberty, and "the free flow of information online", though these statements have been criticized as being a shield for its alt-right and extremist ecosystem.[25] Antisemitism is prominent in the site's content, and the company itself has engaged in antisemitic commentary on Twitter.[27][32] Researchers note that Gab has been "repeatedly linked to radicalization leading to real-world violent events".[33]" - wiki

Did i just say, 'right-wing media's attack on Gab.com'???  Oh deary.  

Well, yes, but no, but yes but no but...

Well, yes then.  

Antecedents

The attack on Gab is right-wing.  Right-Wing is attacking Right-wing.  We have white supremacists on the one side, and corporate supremacists on the other.  The silencing of Trump WHILE he was president was in fact the only insurrection to take place in America since the aftermath of the Boston Latte Party, and not the Capitol Hill PROTESTS labelled as 'Insurrection' by the true Insurrectionists and subversives to detract mass and global attention from their coup against the seat and seal of the President of the United States for challenging Big Tech and Mainstream News.  

Trump was the litmus test that truly revealed who held the reins of power in the US.  It showed that when push comes to shove, it is the Corporation, Big Tech, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Instagram, Google, whom were the true rulers of America.  Challenge them, and no President is safe.  It effectively revealed the Presidency of America as little different from a constitutional Monarchy.  Where the Constitutional Monarchy is subject to the Laws of Parliament enacted on the will of the people, in America, the Presidency is subject to the Terms and Conditions of the unelected Corporation and their CEOs whom are in effect, a non-constitutional Oligarchy ruling America, and through it, much of the world, excluding the Orientals (chinese in asia) whom are a state capitalist fascist and racist Oligarchy themselves.

It doesn't matter at all that Trump was more than a bit of twit.  What matters is that he was the President, and he was taken down WHILST he was president.  To silence a president is no different from taking him out the back and shooting him in the head.  All those who hated Trump were too focused on their hatred of Trump to realise that they were trading democracy, and their love for it, to have him removed.  They wanted immediate gratification, and they couldn't see further.  

So thereafter, summary executions took place all over social media under the guise of getting rid of white supremacists, etc.  They got rid of all sorts of dissenters from the mainstream western agenda.  All those who were anti-Zionazism, all those who challenged the hegemony of the west, all those who challenged the primacy of states like China.  And most importantly, this was being done by UNELECTED Corporate CEOs and their henchmen brandishing delete buttons.  Their 'community guidelines', and their self-serving ways of applying it, now displaced the 1st Amendment.  It was like the government had outsourced the silencing of dissent to their own privatised militia silencing all dissent throughout the globe to anything that was being enforced as the norm.  

So Now

We have the first steps towards what is hopefully a burgeoning Alternative to the Corporate Internet.  Amongst others, like Parler, we have Gab.com.  And this has the Corporate Internet quaking in their knickers.  Here's where they are pulling a very obvious and underhanded way to discredit Gab, and along with it, ALL alternative streams of information, perspectives and thought falling outside of the Corporate bandwidth.  

So now, Gab is being classified as a haven for the rejects of Facebook and Corporate Social Media.  It is supposedly a nest of pointy-capped Klu Klux Klanners, of Neo-Nazis, of extremists, a hotbed for the breeding, education, and dispatching of terrorists and insurrectionists.  Basically, it is being put forth by Google - one of the owners of the Corporate Internet and the Whitehouse - as a dystopian no man's wasteland straight out of Mad Max's Beyond Thunderdrome, with its CEOs synonymised with the big bad mamma, Aunty Entity, and dominated by Master Blaster-like neanderthals waving burning crosses, and throwing up arthritic nazi salutes.  

Well done Big Tech, well done!  But only half-done i'm afraid.  

You see, Big Tech and the Corporate Net, are banking on a truism for an argument, and presenting one part of the truth as the entirety of the truth.  Yes! Gab, and other Alt social media sites are a hotbed of white supremacism, neo-Nazism, and chock a block full of HICKory dickories whom have slightly less intelligence than that which can be gathered in a thimble with room to spare.  But Gab, amongst others, are not just a single house with a single bed, but Hugh Hef's mansion with a whole load of rooms with all sorts of fancy stuff to satisfy and provide all types with room to do what they hell they want and can.  It's like Pornhub without the porn, full of difference, curiosities, and things that make you go, 'hey, i didn't think of that!', or at least, it has the potential to be as such if the Corporate Media does not present it as a digital version of a terrorist training camp.

It is a fact that it is going to attract some nasties, but that is because of the one factor that the Corporate Net is not focusing on, and doesn't want anyone to appreciate AT ALL.  

Freedom of Speech.  

It is the one true slice of America that is left where the 1st Amendment still stands.  Why do you think it is the 1st?  It is because it is the cornerstone upon which everything else should stand, because it is the individual and his and her thoughts which is to be the final check on it all.  Remove that, and you are immediately within tyranny.  The subversion of the 1st Amendment has been the goal of The Corporation from the word 'go!'.  Why?  Because it enables one to be the designer of one's own mind and soul, as opposed to subjecting it to the profiteering design of the Corporation.  All along the way, they have attempted to subvert the 1st Amendment, not by getting rid of the right to free speech, but to control the mind that articulates it.  And this is best effected through the young whom have not the wisdom of the experience of the past and alternatives.    

Again, MSM, or Mainstream Social Media, is attempting to demonise the whole with the part as argument.  In other words, on the one hand, they censor those who call for the death of LGBT members, and following from that, they also censor those who say that LGBT is wrong, thus classifying both as one and banning them.  Then, when both flock to Gab, the Media just focus on Gab being popular with those who call for the death of LGBT, thus warning all good people to stay away from it, and at the same time presenting membership of Gab.com as a badge of shame.  

What they are attempting to do is to synonymise being banned by Facebook with simply being a bad gal or guy, instead of being a free thinker who is capable of objectively navigating through bias and bullshit to get to the truth of things whether such a truth is 'trending' or not.  Any by doing so, they are equating 'rejected by facebook' with 'alternative', and 'alternative' with, 'extremist, evil, 'crazy whackjobs' '.  It is too obvious a psychological sleight-of-hand designed to present Corporate Social Media as the alternative to bullshit.  

You see, the People's Social Media, as i call it, is not just a place for americans, or out-of-the-box thinkers, but for people of all cultures and climes who can't challenge western hegemony on Corporate Social Media without being barred for having the cheek to use their cultural standards to, for instance, judge the LGBT as depraved.  In that sense, CSM is in part a western supremacist organisation itself that puts forth what is trending amongst their young as the only trend that ought to catch on in the world, and if you speak against it, you will be banned.  So in that sense itself, Gab et al is far from a white supremacist hub, but a supplier of soapboxes for all inclinations, cultures, and climes.

Why I support the People's Social Media





I personally went to Gab as i'm too Indian for facebook, as in, i could not apply the cultural standards of an ancient civilisation of more than a billion people to judge the west as the west judges all.  I went to Gab because i'm too American-of-the-past in my character to put up with the nonsense of the Eurofeminists and LGBT.  I went to Gab as i'm too much of a non-Nazi to keep silent as Jews go on the rampage in Palestine, shooting women and children and taking their homes to create a racially, or culturally, exclusive state.  I went to Gab because i'm so against fascism, racism, and racial supremacy that I often get banned by Facebook for highlighting its many manifestations.  I went to Gab because i believe not only in my freedom to say what i want, but to access and consider all views out there on all matters. 

A house is not to be defined by who occupies it, but for whom it can give room to.  Where there is free speech, you can find demons, but there is as much room for angels as well.  That cannot, logically, be said of Corporate Social Media.

I know there are many racists there, but i know it has room for those who speak against it.  A house is not to be defined by who occupies it, but for whom it can give room to.  Where there is free speech, you can find demons, but there is as much room for angels as well.  That cannot, logically, be said of Corporate Social Media. 

One cannot police opinion on things online, if one cannot ensure society is perfect in reality.  He who does so will end up perpetuating evil in society for want of discussion and improvement through online discussion.  That is the inbuilt weakness in censorship.      

The Fact of the Matter  

Being banned by Facebook and other fascist corporate cronies of theirs is synonymous with, 

firstly, exercising your right to free speech despite the biases of Facebook, right or wrong; 

secondly, the ability to think out of the box wherein Corporate Social Media thinks you should remain; 

thirdly, questioning things that are commonly thought to be true or the norm.  

These 3 things, and the freedom of speech, can be done badly or well, by evil or by virtue, but the very ability to do it is the only means by which tyranny and evil can be checked.  And in that, it is a sacred gift.  

Where there is free speech, one will hear both the hiss of the viper and the Sermon on the Mount - that is designed to put down the former.   Those who falsely presents such a locale as nothing but a breeding ground of vipers, in effect, are preventing people from giving ear to the latter.  That effectively gets rid of the power of the people to ever do anything about vipers.  It is they whom do that whom are the true evil.

Such Corporate Power can be synonymised with the Romans who justify crucifying Christ by pointing to the thieves they crucified alongside him to present the Romans as just.   You could even say that the Romans crucify theives just so that they can crucify saviours with impunity as the former argues for their being just.  It's like the Devil telling you that he will get rid of the few demons that bother you provided that you agree to him killing all Saviours.  That only puts the devil in power in perpetuity.  And that's exactly what Corporate Social Media is doing.  

Where there is free speech, one will hear both the hiss of the viper and the Sermon on the Mount - that is designed to put down the former.   Those who falsely presents such a locale as nothing but a breeding ground of vipers, in effect, are preventing people from giving ear to the latter.  That effectively gets rid of the power of the people to ever do anything about vipers.  It is they whom do that whom are the true evil.

edX

[the writer is a facebook-reject who got banned for stating that 'israel' is a terrorist-state that should not have its name recognised as it is an insult to the palestinians whose lands and homes they stole, and that all whom support them are terrorist-sympathisers.]

#gab #freespeech