Vaccines Lowering Viral Transmission, a myth?


Do you remember when they said that the vaccine would NOT stop transmission?

Then when  people started saying that therefore there was no need to take it, then the story changed to, "yes, it will decrease transmission by half."





Alright, let's consider it then.

So even if it stops transmission by half, if i get on board a plane with just 2 vaccinated people whom are also virus-carriers, they together still pose a 100% risk don't they. 

So what about a flight with a few hundred passengers?  I stand a, say, 15 000%  chance instead of 30 000% chance of getting infected if everyone is vaccinated?  Is there really a difference between either when the percentage is bloody high both ways?

And when you add that percentage chance to all the other people I'm going to meet, to walk past, to drink amongst, to shit and piss with, to take lifts with, cutting transmission chances from 1 million % (with non-vaccinated people) to half a million % (with vaccinated people) isn't going to make bugger all difference is it.

And we still need to take into account the amount of time spent with the person as well. Spending, say, 30 seconds with a vaccinated virus carrier (VVC) puts me at, say, 50% risk.  A minute puts me at a 100% risk.  How is the vaccine cutting down transmission then?   It cuts it down theoretically, but real life experiences renders it negligible.


Percentages have to take on board the whole story, not just the individual chances.  Buying a lottery ticket might give you a chance at winning a million quid.  Buying a 2nd can double your chances.  But that's great if only 4 lottery tickets are produced, not if a 100 million are produced.  

You could say that you stand a far better chance at striking the lottery than NOT getting the virus from VVCs given that the viral load of a VVC also stands to increase with that person's contact with other VVCs, and your contact with multiple VVCs.  Even if you come into contact with one person, you are also coming into contact with everyone the person has met.   So where is the real life benefit of 50% reduced transmission?  I'm genuinely asking.

This renders vaccine Passports or POVs - proof of vaccine - for employees, entry, etc, utterly pointless and anti-Human Rights, especially since it is an experimental vaccine, and many have had a variety of adverse reactions to it.


All these studies appear to be looking at standalone cases in terms of how much virus a VVC carries or can transmit, NOT how much this increases upon contact with more persons in a multitude of ways.

Whilst it may not be a myth that vaccination reduces viral transmission by half, it making any significant difference in real world experiences might very well be.

Reduced transmission from vaccination can very much be utterly pointless because even 1 vaccinated infected person can start the whole pandemic again.  Let's not forget that the whole pandemic started with ONE person didn't it.  



edX

#chinavirus #chinavirus19 #covid #covid19 #vaccine #conspiracy #NWO #NewWorldOrder 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Chinglish, not Singlish.

Image
Ever wonder how 'singlish' sounds so much like the way a chinese child speaks - like that child on the left?  Not like a malay child, not like an indian child.  The next time you speak 'singlish', just ask yourself how different it is from that little boy on the left. That indicates that 'singlish' is not actually 'singlish', but 'chinglish'.  And this further indicates that the formation of this so-called colloquial and unofficial ‘national’ language indicates that non-chinese differences were not considered in its formation, which, incidentally, parallels the chinese-determined criteria of what alright and not alright in all other arenas.   No wonder that the msn.com site for singapore is called ‘xin.msn.com’.  If it is representative of anything, it is only of post-80s chinese self-absorption.  Same goes for the ‘wit‘ which is typical of the wit in Chinese media and conversations.  Childish, and has no resemblance with the higher level...
Read more

Xingapore and Sinonazism in s.e.Asia

Image
It's interesting to know that xingapore's cable and broadband companies are sort of partnering with China's telecom firms like 'hwa wei' as well. Wonder when these people are going to grow up, get egalitarian, and stop sticking to their own - and stop caring about falling chinese birth rates as if that is an issue in what is supposed to be a multicultural state. And, by the way, the U.S. has issued alerts against Hwa Wei and ZTE as security threats and possibly linked to China's government and military. related article on BBC - China's love-hate relationship with what is foreign Singapore, after all, is going to fast-track china's citizens into taking over the rest of the region But i suppose in the chinese supremacist state of xingapore, that is not a problem. (calling it a ‘chinese supremacist’ state is not an ‘opinion’ but a matter of definition, i.e. stating that singapore must always have a chinese majority; that our 'mother tongue will be mand...
Read more

Singaporeans upset about Indonesian naming ships after their ‘heroes’? Why?

Image
Indonesian military officers have pulled out of a Singapore aerospace show amid a row over the controversial naming of a naval warship. Indonesia angered its neighbour by naming the new ship after two marines who carried out a bombing which killed three people in Singapore in 1965. Singapore's second minister for defence said he was "disappointed" with Indonesia's naming decision. Jakarta defended the move saying it was customary to name vessels after heroes. - bbc In conversation, Ed: I don't see what the fuss is about. The chinese fascist government of singapore had no problem erecting a statue of mass-murdering chinese premiere, Deng Xiao Ping in singapore. And anyway, the attack was on Malaysia, not singapore - as singapore was a part of Malaysia then. So this issue is actually a non-issue. The singapore government is just trying to flex its paltry muscles regionally. Silly fellas. Kelvin Leong: while I may not agree 100% with the way my government handled t...
Read more