Misnomers Kill

It appears that if something is called a 'vaccine', it is excused if some, or even numerous, die after taking it.

But if it is called a 'health supplement', and even one person dies, it is immediately banned, or people are warned, or it is suspended pending hard proof that it is not responsible.

LIKE a health supplement, this 'vaccine' does not confer immunity; it MAY help in reducing the severity of illness; it does not stop transmission.

But how it may be distinguished from the 'vaccine' is that...

...unlike a health supplement, it can carry a higher post-exposure risk of immediate death, delayed death, stroke, myocarditis, pericarditis, miscarriages, paralysis, blindness, blood clots, amputations, has been associated with worsening preexisting conditions, is able to inflict illness in the recipient that may then serve as the preexisting conditions that can be worsened by the 'covid' virus or other viruses or ailments, along with other unknown or undisclosed short-term, long-term, and cross-generational (epigenetic) consequences. 

Do you personally know anyone who suffered any of the above after taking a cod liver oil pill, or a clove of garlic?  

So what is the incontrovertible justification for terming this a vaccine instead of a health supplement of increasingly hazardous reputation?  

But i suppose this can be accepted IF, a 'vaccine', from hereon, is supposed to refer to a non-traditional health supplement with enough possible hazardous effects to render it of less preferable prophylactic and therapeutic value compared to traditional health supplements like those that come in the form of pills to emulsions, cuisines, the British 5-a-day, curries and chutneys, a ramble in the countryside, or even a daily half-hour Yoga session followed by an episode of Only Fools and Horses.

Has anyone,  or will anyone, ever study the Absolute Risk Reduction of a clove of garlic, or turmeric, amongst other frequently used culinary items, and put them through Phase 1 to 3 trials, compared to the life-threatening offerings of Pfizer et al?

The question people ought to be asking is,

How, pray tell, does a term like 'vaccine' qualify as an alibi protecting it from scrutiny and culpability that a 'health supplement' would be subjected to without thy need for placards and protests?

This is the first time in human history that a misnomer has been used to effect Holocaustal ends.

edX