The Freedom to Love actually means...
I'm all for the freedom to love without boundaries.
To the angel, it means to give unto your neighbour as you give unto your own. It means to love those in need without a system-imposed opportunity cost that makes one unable to afford to give to your neighbour. It means to be free to give till it works, as opposed to being systemically-impoverished and class-subjugated so that we have to stop giving because it hurts (our pockets).
In a society where we are thus free to love by giving our utmost to each other, our only constraint would be nature and the scarcity of resources, or the lack of technology and knowledge to make even more of nature, or not getting past our own self-absorbtion so that we can offer maximal therapeutic or supportive help to our neighbour, NOT, one sector hoarding resources, or steering human intellectual and spiritual progress in a direction that disables us from being able to do the above.
THAT, is the Freedom to Love without Limits, boundaries, apprehension.
TO the devil, however, the 'freedom to love without limits' is, to fuck your neighbour as you do your own... and your family too. When one becomes debased enough to find freedom through this, one would rarely aspire to more.
What the LGBT movement is doing is to monopolise the idea of the freedom to love, and thus whitewashing the system that had been compromising it for ages. It is certainly not their intention to do, but it is certainly the consequence. When we find freedom in the little things, we'll become little enough to not want more. The LGBT is both a result of that, and its propagator to the innocent children of the world.
Love is a many splendoured thing indeed, but the LGBT is guilty of sexualising it. There is no gratification without sexual gratification to them. Nothing is worth anything if it doesn't lead to sexual gratification. They prefer 'friends with benefits' as opposed to seeing a friend AS a benefit. Platonic love to them is oppression. And from that, we can expect the promotion of incest, infidelity, and the death of the marital institution and all morality, religion, and philosophy itself.
This ethos is a carry-on from the capitalist consumerist impulse that can have nothing strange in the way of pure unadulterated and unfettered consumption.
They who sexualise love are guilty of reducing and subjugating it and themselves to the sexual aspect. We are much more than that. But they insist that our children grow up to be no more than that.
No.
edX
#lgbt #stopLGBT
Comments
Post a Comment