The Freedom to Love actually means...


I'm all for the freedom to love without boundaries.  

To the angel, it means to give unto your neighbour as you give unto your own.  It means to love those in need without a system-imposed opportunity cost that makes one unable to afford to give to your neighbour.  It means to be free to give till it works, as opposed to being systemically-impoverished and class-subjugated so that we have to stop giving because it hurts (our pockets).   

In a society where we are thus free to love by giving our utmost to each other, our only constraint would be nature and the scarcity of resources, or the lack of technology and knowledge to make even more of nature, or not getting past our own self-absorbtion so that we can offer maximal therapeutic or supportive help to our neighbour, NOT, one sector hoarding resources, or steering human intellectual and spiritual progress in a direction that disables us from being able to do the above. 

THAT, is the Freedom to Love without Limits, boundaries, apprehension.

TO the devil, however, the 'freedom to love without limits' is, to fuck your neighbour as you do your own... and your family too.  When one becomes debased enough to find freedom through this, one would rarely aspire to more.   

What the LGBT movement is doing is to monopolise the idea of the freedom to love, and thus whitewashing the system that had been compromising it for ages.  It is certainly not their intention to do, but it is certainly the consequence.  When we find freedom in the little things, we'll become little enough to not want more.  The LGBT is both a result of that, and its propagator to the innocent children of the world. 

Love is a many splendoured thing indeed, but the LGBT is guilty of sexualising it.  There is no gratification without sexual gratification to them.   Nothing is worth anything if it doesn't lead to sexual gratification.  They prefer 'friends with benefits' as opposed to seeing a friend AS a benefit. Platonic love to them is oppression.  And from that, we can expect the promotion of incest, infidelity, and the death of the marital institution and all morality, religion, and philosophy itself.  

This ethos is a carry-on from the capitalist consumerist impulse that can have nothing strange in the way of pure unadulterated and unfettered consumption.

They who sexualise love are guilty of reducing and subjugating it and themselves to the sexual aspect.  We are much more than that.  But they insist that our children grow up to be no more than that.

No.

edX 

#lgbt #stopLGBT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Chinglish, not Singlish.

Image
Ever wonder how 'singlish' sounds so much like the way a chinese child speaks - like that child on the left?  Not like a malay child, not like an indian child.  The next time you speak 'singlish', just ask yourself how different it is from that little boy on the left. That indicates that 'singlish' is not actually 'singlish', but 'chinglish'.  And this further indicates that the formation of this so-called colloquial and unofficial ‘national’ language indicates that non-chinese differences were not considered in its formation, which, incidentally, parallels the chinese-determined criteria of what alright and not alright in all other arenas.   No wonder that the msn.com site for singapore is called ‘xin.msn.com’.  If it is representative of anything, it is only of post-80s chinese self-absorption.  Same goes for the ‘wit‘ which is typical of the wit in Chinese media and conversations.  Childish, and has no resemblance with the higher level
Read more

Singaporeans upset about Indonesian naming ships after their ‘heroes’? Why?

Image
Indonesian military officers have pulled out of a Singapore aerospace show amid a row over the controversial naming of a naval warship. Indonesia angered its neighbour by naming the new ship after two marines who carried out a bombing which killed three people in Singapore in 1965. Singapore's second minister for defence said he was "disappointed" with Indonesia's naming decision. Jakarta defended the move saying it was customary to name vessels after heroes. - bbc In conversation, Ed: I don't see what the fuss is about. The chinese fascist government of singapore had no problem erecting a statue of mass-murdering chinese premiere, Deng Xiao Ping in singapore. And anyway, the attack was on Malaysia, not singapore - as singapore was a part of Malaysia then. So this issue is actually a non-issue. The singapore government is just trying to flex its paltry muscles regionally. Silly fellas. Kelvin Leong: while I may not agree 100% with the way my government handled t
Read more

Singapore’s Racist ‘Meritocracy’

Image
Meritocracy. To the common mind, it simply means going by how one scores in exams. That’s it. But that’s not it. Meritocracy goes deeper than simple educational achievement. It has much to do with an overarching ‘system of preference’ that is promoted via a host of means. Of course one can say that we ‘prefer’ those with higher scores. But this sort of ‘preference’ is embedded within an overarching ‘system of preference’ that impacts on how we perceive ourselves, each other, and what we are taught to view as the right way of thinking and doing things. It is this that truly reveals what any particular ‘meritocratic’ system entails. For instance, back in the 70s and 80s, there was a common perception that manufacturing was a ‘chinese thing’; that Indians make good lawyers; or that Malays are great at song and dance. We saw lots of Malays being taken into Civil Defence, whilst I saw quite a few of my Indian friends going into Infantry or Guardsmen. This sort of perception or practi
Read more