civilisationReview

The Age of Information becomes the Age of the Greatest of lies when the monopoly on the prodiction and purveyance Information is held by the few within a class-based elitist exploitative system.  In an instant, a lie can be propagated throughout the world with the push of a button.  Such an age thus becomes, not the Age of Information, but the the Age of Disinformation and Mass Assimilation. This is the time the Prince of Lies will Reign. The purpose of a lie, a wicked system, unjust laws, etc, of great magnitude is not done as an end in itself, but for the production, propagation, promotion, and perpetuation of the MEANS the people will resort to, to put up with it.  It is from that, that the evil achieves its magnitude and redraws the longitude and latitude of human identity and reality.   edX #NWO #NewWorldOrder #conspiracy #sociology #psychology

Question: Is it possible that when one takes the RNA vaccine, whatever is produced within their bodies interact with the cv19 virus when they come into contact with it later to create a stronger variant that kills people whom have not taken the vaccine?   In other words, is the RNA vaccine actually creating more deadly strains when the vaccinated come into contact with the original virus?  If so, that might explain spikes in countries which had previously not been as afflicted.  These new variants may take a longer time to evolve under normal unvaccinated conditions, and which we can develop immunity to gradually without too negative a consequence because our immune systems can keep up with slower mutations.  But is the RNA vaccine speeding this up thus creating one wave after another and variants as well?  Why Ask? The point of asking these questions is to get around the Corporate media not asking anything that might compromise the ...

Do you remember when they said that the vaccine would NOT stop transmission? Then when  people started saying that therefore there was no need to take it, then the story changed to, "yes, it will decrease transmission by half." Alright, let's consider it then. So even if it stops transmission by half, if i get on board a plane with just 2 vaccinated people whom are also virus-carriers, they together still pose a 100% risk don't they.  So what about a flight with a few hundred passengers?  I stand a, say, 15 000%  chance instead of 30 000% chance of getting infected if everyone is vaccinated?  Is there really a difference between either when the percentage is bloody high both ways? And when you add that percentage chance to all the other people I'm going to meet, to walk past, to drink amongst, to shit and piss with, to take lifts with, cutting transmission chances from 1 million % (with non-vaccinated people) to half a millio...