civilisationReview

  Well, it seems that the government in singapore is taking away the 'subsidy' for medical treatment for covid patients if they don't take the injection, stating that the government shouldn't be forking out for those whom are taxing the medical system because of the alleged severe illness that allegedly comes to the uninjected.  This is on top of other proscriptions on the uninjected, including children.  Firstly, i don't know what 'subsidy' they are talking about given that medical treatment is a high profit industry in singapore.  The government's idea of a 'subsidy' is charging people exorbitant sums for something and with a high profit margin, and then giving a discount.  That is what they do with housing for their tenants, i mean, citizens, don't they.  I think they don't know the difference between a subsidy and a discount.  Anyway, let's get to the reasons why cost-imposition on the uninjected is unscientific. 1.  To say that c...

Don't make the mistake of paying attention to only the prominent ones for information and insight. That's what the foolish celeb-worshippers do.   It is that stupid attitude that leads to all sorts of problems in the first place.  All my worthless friends are part of this problem.   When you don't pay attention to each other, you not only lose information, but you also discourage each other from thinking,  and that eventually reduces collective thought,  and finally places you at the mercy of the insights of the few. Remember, the wealth of information from nobodies always far outweigh the prominent celebs.  Assume that to be true, and at the very least, you will make it a self-fulfilling prophecy. edX https://www.bitchute.com/video/sykhDQAHLil8/

Actually, whatever 'virus' the tests detect, there is no proof that it is a malignant virus.  The fact that 99.x% of people are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic from the very beginning argues for, 1. This virus being a boogeyman that is blamed for deaths from 'preexisting conditions' when the preexisting conditions itself might be responsible for deaths, so as to get people to believe in a 'pandemic' and take injections that are for other purposes, OR, 2. that people develop immunity very quickly thus negating the need for injections or any restrictions. My take is that these tests are used BECAUSE they are inaccurate so as to not always detect a 'virus' that might be found in most people and has been the case for thousands of years perhaps.  If it was to be detected so the time, and everyone is fine, people will realise there isn't a pandemic. So, it is erratic in its results thus giving people the impression that they are either ...

No source of information can be taken as credible unless it can continously fend off all contradiction as that is the only means by which a source of information can be deemed to be credible. In other words, there is no such thing as an unquestionable source of information.  Any party that claims credibility and demonises contradiction, hence, immediately ceases to be credible as they are attempting to remove the only means by which they can be proven to be credible. In the scientific field, the word that is used is HYPOTHESIS not 'falsehood' or misinformation. Without hypothesis, there is no science.   Terming a hypothesis or contradiction as 'falsehood', 'misinformation', etc, is illogical and downright nonsensical as that disables the very engine that drives science forward. Finally, there is no such thing as 'silly conspiracy theories'.  All ideas and perspectives give us an opportunity to test our beliefs.   I'm curious about differe...