The Jewish Problem

Nasser: Zionists occupied two nations Palestine and America.

Palestinians won't get their independence until Americans get theirs!

 

Why include the americans as victims of Zionist colonisation?  Most of them support the Jewish-Zionists don't they.  Is it possible that most americans hate Israel, but still fork out money to support one government after another whom support 'israel' in everyway, and from the 1900s to the present?  And how is it that America is occupied by Zionists?  Those who fought the British weren't Jews were they?  The slave-owning and racist 'founding fathers' weren't Jews were they?  If America is occupied, it is BY the whites and Jews.  Just ask the natives.  

And most Jews in america are Zionists aren't they.  That is why they can publicly hold parades in New York, support 'israel', have all presidents supporting it, employ 'israeli' terrorists to act in Hollywood productions, Hollywood 'stars' holding big gala events to raise money to support Jewish terrorists in Palestine, have Jews cast positively in Hollywood productions (whilst they religiously disparage christians  and Christianity) and Hollywood itself is owned by Jews and is pro-israel isn't it?  Is the opposite of being 'anti-semitic' being a 'jew lover' who will never view them in a bad light even when they shout, pout, and are noty and not nice?  
  

Having an 'Israeli' play Wonder Woman is no different from having a Nazi play Superman.  Both validate ethnic cleansing, and it is a claim to, and assertion of moral impunity for that which is immoral.  This illustrates, at the very least, an absence of mass jewish opposition to 'israel', as there would be if a member of Al Qaeda or ISIS or a Nazi was cast in a favourable role.  

So what's with the distinction between 'jew' and 'zionist'/israeli?  To distinguish between both is to excuse the former whom are supporting and fueling the jewish terrorists in Palestine.  The latter cannot succeed without the support of the former.  You don't see mass Jewish protests against 'israel' globally do you, even though the terrorism committed by jews in palestine is done in the name of all jews in the world, and for all of them? 





When Muslim militants committed what the west calls, 'acts of terrorism' against them (for the sake of accuracy, they were 'retaliatory attacks', but the west avoids that terms as it reveals the fact that the west started it first, as evidenced by history), Muslims in various parts of the world had to state, 'not in my name', to distance themselves from accusations that they support retaliatory actions, aka, 'terrorism', against western imperialism. 

(western imperialism is a fact of history and the present.  To say that the attacks it elicits is 'terrorism' and not 'retaliatory attacks' is a white supremacist claim that the whites have the right to do what they will unto others without censure.....and you don't have to be white to be a white supremacist, as evidenced in the above picture.)

But in the case of Jewish terrorism in Palestine, committed in the name of all Jews in the world, with an open invitation to all Jews in the world to live there, funded by prominent Jewish Organisations that have mass Jewish support and respect, you don't see a global movement on the part of Jews who state, '#not in my name' do you.  At most, you might see a small group of Jews in their dozens speaking against Jewish occupation of Palestine, whilst thousands of Jews supporting ethnic cleansing in Palestine march by, and call this small group 'traitors' and so on.  If anyone are good at stoking anti-Jewish sentiments, it is this very blatant and brazen group of Zionists whom are doing it.  When enough people of a race are of a particular sort, that race becomes synonymous with that sort.  That is when it isn't racist to dislike such a people, but immoral to not do so.  

Not only does this incontrovertibly illustrate the degree to which white supremacism has led to even victims of western terrorism against Islamic states excusing it, but the degree to which the Jews can publicly support what is verifiably terrorist action and ethnic cleansing in Palestine for close to a hundred years, and get away with it, and again, with the support of white supremacist states like the US, and basically all of western Europe who even insult the Palestinians' plight by including the Jews of Palestine in their 'Eurovision' song contest, thus validating their ethnic-cleansing of Palestinians. 

So all their 'efforts' to resolve the Jewish-Palestinian crisis are nothing but an effort to get the Palestinians to accept the Jews taking most of their land and just living with the little they have left.  Again, white supremacism in action, especially since it is the white west whom gave much of the land to the Jews in the first place.  How about the Arabs walk into the UK and the US and give 50% of it away?  No.  Not alright?  So how is it that the west can do it?  That is white supremacism, and that, in effect, makes them as responsible for the deaths of every Palestinian man, woman and child.  They aren't the finger behind the trigger, but they certainly are the suppliers of the ammo, by their validation of the state of 'israel', their businesses, etc.  And in effect, that makes the US and the EU, terrorist organisations.  That is going by THEIR definition of terrorism and terrorists supporters.

 

If the Jews of america, or even the world, don't want to be classed as 'terrorists' and 'supporters of terrorism', tell them to stand up and be counted.  If i don't hear them opposing 'israel', then they ought to be opposed, as a portion of every penny flowing to a Jew might very well end up buying arms for Jewish terrorists in Palestine.  In fact, all the money paid globally for american movies coming from Hollywood also funds Jewish terrorism against the Palestinians in Palestine, if you think about it.  Hollywood is brazenly Zionist, in their employing Israelis to play heroes in their productions, and is largely controlled and owned by Jews.  If they were anti-Zionist, would they be doing this?  No.  

For instance, having an 'Israeli' play Wonder Woman and Cleopatra is no different from having a Nazi play Superman.  Both validate ethnic cleansing, and casting them as heroes in the face of that fact is a claim to, and assertion of, moral impunity for that which is immoral.  It illustrates, at the very least, an absence of mass jewish opposition to 'israel', as there would be if a member of Al Qaeda or ISIS or the son of Hitler, was cast as Moses in a Hollywood production.  Gal Gadot, for instance, not only illegally occupies Palestine, but has also been a member of the Israeli Terrorist Forces - known as Israeli Defence Forces by terrorist sympathisers - and yet, she is presented as a hero to the world via Wonder Woman, and people flock to donate money to the Jewish terrorist cause in Palestine by queueing for tickets and buying relevant merchandise.  They too, have Palestinian blood on their hands.





As for the charge of 'anti-semitism', the Jews can shove it, for 2 reasons. 

1. Just dismissing everyone who opposes you as 'anti-semitic racists' is akin to a child throwing a tantrum and saying that the next door neighbour kid's parents hate her because they told her off for beating up their kid for being a Palestinian and stealing her toys.  If you act as a group, for your group, despite other groups, get support from your group, with little opposition from your group, then it is not scientific to criticise you as individuals independent of the group, as that allows the group to incubate more individuals whom are led to think the way it does.  To do so is tantamount to stupidity, or gross bias.  I've never aspired to be either, though the Jews seem inclined to expect it from their supporters.   

2.  The Palestinians are 'semitic' too.  So how is it that disliking the Jews for behaving like their Nazi oppressors 'anti-semitic'?  That is like my disliking the French, but being condemned for not liking Europeans as a whole.  That not only further indicates Jewish self-absorption to the point that they can deny the Palestinians their linguistic ethnicity, but shows an underhanded effort on their part to make their daily oppression of the Palestinians as an effort against an organisation, not a race, or ethnic group. 

This is really insidious.  They are not only marginalising and murdering Palestinians, but they are also denying them an ethnic or racial group.  By claiming Palestine as 'Israel', they are wiping out the nationality and ethnic group of 'Palestinians', and further reinforcing it by denying them their ethnic-linguistic grouping of 'Semites', which is also what the Jews are.  So they are not only ethnically-cleansing Palestine, but they are cleansing the Palestinians of their ethnicity.

And pray tell, have you seen any Jew raising this point before?  I don't think all Jews intend it this way, but it is telling of the degree of the self-absorption of the global Jewish race for not even noticing this.  But if even a quarter of this was to be done to them, we'll hear charges of 'anti-semitism' being screamed out from here to the moon.  
  

The 'Not all of us are like that' Argument

I'm not into excusing an entire race because 10% of them aren't like 90% of them, as that gives the 90% absolution on the penance of the 10%, and enables them to continue doing what they do.  I'm not saying that the 10% ought to suffer the consequences.  They certainly shouldn't.  I'm saying that we cannot excuse the 90% because of the 10%.  People who act in the interest of their race against that of others out of greed, will continue to do so if they aren't called to account as a race.  "Not all Germans are Nazis."  And that was the view that enabled the Nazis to grow to the proportions they did, and do what they did. 

The United States had no problem throwing atomic bombs at Japanese women and children even though MOST of them weren't soldiers.  But when it comes to the Jews, we keep hearing, 'but, but, but, not all Jews are Zionists!  You are an anti-semite!'.  Well dear, most of them are.  They are 90% of the time, interchangeable terms.  If that wasn't a fact, i'd hear about their resistance to Israel 90% of the time, as opposed to their support of it 90% of the time, especially since they have a significant influence on the media in the United States. 

This 'Defence by 10% innocence' is rubbish.  I can simply start a race-based racist organisation, get all or most of my race to subscribe to it, come up with racist policies, and to avoid being criticised as racist, just employ 10% of my race to speak against me, and then criticise anyone who call us racist as racists for stereotyping us because 10% of our race aren't racists.  That just enables me to whitewash the actions of 90% of us doesn't it.  That is like saying that if one whiteman is innocent of a crime, then all white people can never be charged with a crime.  

Of course, I'm not saying that the elite Jews are employing a small number of pro-israel Jews to speak against 'Israel' so as to disable criticism of Jews as a whole.  It's possible, but i really don't think people could be so underhanded.  What i'm saying is that the effect is identical.   
  




To those Jews whom truly are against the Jewish Zionists, they have my fullest sympathies, love, and support, as they are in effect the 'collateral damage' of the Jewish Zionists whom make all Jews look bad.  But it is the 90% of Jews whom are Zionists whom make it practical to check if the Jew you are befriending is a Zionist or not before you give him a single penny or even have a cup of tea with him.  It is unfortunate.  But the alternative is to fund 90% of the Jews because 10% of the Jews are cute and cuddly.  That is not practical for the purposes of getting rid of Zionism.   

In fact, perhaps anti-Zionist Jews ought to wear a badge, a lapel pin, or something, to state that they are anti-Zionists.  Not only will this serve as an argument that this isn't a Jewish problem - and reduce true anti-Jewism - but it will also send a clear message to the Jews in Palestine, and all their supporters, that they are a bunch of fartbags that need deflating.  During the Nazi campaign against the Jews, Jews were made to wear an armband indicating that they were Jews, and therefore bad.  That was evil.  But now, they can wear a badge to indicate that they are against an evil.  Wouldn't that be nice? 

If Modi was to win more and more support amongst Indians in his ultra-nationalistic stance, i too would wear a badge stating that as an Indian, i'm against it, to give Modi and his bunch of fascist, racist knuckledraggers their well-deserved two-fingered salute; show others that being an Indian is not synonymous with being a fascist inbred; make it clear that his racist appeal to me is not going to go anywhere; and to tell other indians not to support this fartsack.  When people's lives are at stake, that is the least we can do. 

I don't think people need to prove that they aren't bad - and thus need to wear such a badge - but when much of their race are doing bad, to be silent and invisible is to encourage it.  That is even more the case when the evil one's race is doing is put forth for the benefit of all of one's race.  Even if one is anti-zionist, but remains silent, one still cannot claim innocence for one simple reason - your child, your niece, nephew, etc, may one day grow up and claim the proceeds from such an evil.  Just as a responsible parent will deem it practical to ensure that the sociopolitical system is maintained in a way that their children don't fall victim to it, similarly, they should stand against evils that their children and the children of others don't fund or fall prey to it.   

On the one hand, we have jew-lovers whom support them no matter what evil they do.  On the other, we have Jew-haters, who despise them no matter what good they do.  For myself, I just dislike anti-fascist, racist, self-serving, culturally hegemonic, culturally inbreeding, and ethnic cleansing assholes whatever their form or faction.  And in this respect, and in this context, if that is most of the Jews of America, if not the world, then they are a problem.  
  

edX