Dear LGBT, Jesus Doesn't Like You. Get over it.


"Three Polish women have been found not guilty of offending religious feelings over posters depicting the Virgin Mary with a rainbow halo.

The activists displayed the images in 2019 in response to an Easter display describing "gender" and "LGBT" as sins.

The icon used in the artwork, "Our Lady of Czestochowa", is revered by many Polish Catholics.

The women would have faced up to two years in prison if found guilty in the case." - bbc

Huh?  So it was found that they did not offend religious feelings?  So the catholics who revere it find it cool and are now emblazoning it on their t-shirts are they? 

Anyway, i'm alright with people offending each other's 'religious feelings' so long as you do it with argument and reason.  So i don't think these Polish 'women' ought to be arrested or tried.  They can say what they want, but it is up to our right to listen to what is being said to consider if it is right or not. 

That said, 

When are these lgbt people going to realise the fact that GOD DOESN'T LIKE YOU.

Jesus loves sinners, NOT the sin.  And if you publicly go about promoting the sin,  then he isn't going to like you.   He only likes sinners who know what they are doing is a sin, not insist it isn't a sin because they like it.  Get it?  

Yes, my gender-screwed up LGBTophile, God is a homophobe, an LGBTphobe.  He's a bigot.  Just as the devil is a bigot in the face of the good, God is a bigot in the face of sin-promoting turdheads.  

Yes.  I know.  Christ didn't say that men couldn't fuck each other in the ass, or that women shouldn't pretend to be a man and fuck another woman with a rubberised and rotating sock puppet.  But Jesus didn't say that you can't go fuck donkeys either.  That is understood.  He was against lust, and since LGBT is UNBOUNDED lust, 'love without limits', 'freedom to love', you can certainly extrapolate from that that he is going to love you despite of your sin, but not BECAUSE or ALONG with it.  Christ is not like those idiotic parents who tell their gender-screwed up kid, 'it's ok love, i accept that you like to get fucked by other guys in the ass.  You're still me son, and i love you and accept what you do as ok because i love you'.  These western parents really give parenting a bad name.  I have 'friends' too who say, 'well, surely you have LGBT friends like i do', when i tell them that all this LGBT-promotion is wrong.  How is that relevant?  Wrong is wrong, whether my friend does it or not.  I wonder if they'd still see things that way if i left their respective wives with a smile in her bedroom - 'well, you're my friend, so you giving me wife a good seeing to is fine as well.'

Dear LGBT, know the parable of the Prodigal Son?  That story is about a son who lives in sin, but is still loved by his father.  He is finally reunited with his father, not because the father accepts his sin, but because the son accepts that what he is doing or has done, is a sin.  Get it?  So Christ will always have his door open to you, but you gotta leave your sin at the doorstep in acknowledgement that it IS a sin.  It's as simple as that.  Perhaps all that muff-diving has left you a bit oxygen-deprived to the degree that you can't appreciate this obvious point.

Go start your own religion where indiscriminate 'sexual fluidity' and 'freedom to love' is fine.   I think, historically, and Biblically, it is known as, Satanism, the worship of Baal and whatnot, and goes by the principle, 'Indulge, don't abstain'.  You can't remake God in your image just to make yourself feel good about what you do. You just need to look for a 'god' that already matches your image.   Satanists can provide you with one.

So...  To put in a line, God isn't a rubber stamp on your rubber to go trekkin where no man ought to go, and go on a fecking pride march for it thereafter.  So suck it up and deal with it.  God doesn't love you. Jesus thinks you're a dick.  And Mary wishes you'd just shut up and go see a psychiatrist for what you do and promote.  He still loves you, but that doesn't mean he's going to preside over your samesex or bisex union.  You can dial 666 for that.

Time to Judge the West

warning:  The following section is going to offend like hell, but there is a point to it.  


joe
: "Ever had sex with a western woman?"

ed: "no."

joe: "oh, they're difficult to talk into bed?"

ed: "No.  You have to take a number and queue."

(sorry, but western media, etc, have spent so long judging the world that it's about time to stop our magnanimity and judge them for what they are using OUR cultural standards of decency and modesty, since they don't seem to have an equivalent but arrogantly want to promote what they are as having no equal.)


It is nothing to do with 'the freedom to love'.  Western divorce rates are already so high.  They already promote sexual promiscuity, or screwing around just for the hell of it, for its own sake, for decades.  They come up with a whole load of terms to make sense of it and justify it, 'have you scored?', 'friends with benefits', 'one night stand', 'no strings attached sex', etc, etc, and produce a whole load of shows celebrating it - Sex in the City, Californication, Big Bang Theory, American Pie series, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.  Methinks their vocabulary, when it comes to this, is far more extensive than in anything else.  And with a degenerate mindset like that, it's no wonder their communication is generally dominated by 'lol, omg, wtf' and emojis.  Intellectually decapitated indeed.  


So what's with all this 'freedom to love' crap?  You can't even get heterosexual love right with all your divorce rates and infidelity rates going through the roof and over the moon with the cow, whilst dishes are running away with the cutlery, your momma's kissing santa claus in the neighbour's house whilst daddy is watching the Bulls and Lakers in the Play-offs, and you're talking about 'the freedom to love'?  Well, maybe we ought to just do away with the word, 'divorce' as it puts white people in a bad light.  Let's just call it, 'freedom to love' shall we.  After all, that is where the LGBT is heading isn't it.  Mark my words mate.  

Everyone the world over know that western women dress like prostitutes, are easy, slutty, adulterous, and a drink or two and they'll spread like 'i can't believe it's not butter'.  Why do you think their teenage pregnancy rates, or even preteen pregnancy rates are so high?  They even have 10 year old impregnating 12 year olds for goodness sakes, and children raping each other, or grown-ups even, and yet, they'll focus on other countries doing such things far less than what is really going on in the west.  When you have no culture, like animals, you'll be 'putting it about' like a 2nd profession.  And THAT, my paderwan learner, is the west of the post-sexual revolution.  Why on earth is the world taking its cue from such degenerates? 

 

Actually, even westerners from the 1950s would agree with me, but with the passage of time, and due to the increasing degeneracy of their children and grandchildren, because of their love for them, they turn a blind eye to it.  Back in colonial times, the west used to view the arabic region as a sexually debauched area, and viewed western restraint as evidence of western superiority in not behaving like animals.  Now, they view you as inferior if you DON'T behave like animals. 


You can even see remnants of this in MASH, where Klinger is presented as an arab of sorts given to dressing like a woman, or even in Arthur Conan Doyle's 'Sign of Four' where 'Indian' is presented as treacherous, or overly ostentatious to the point of vulgarity and associated with people of some disorder.  White people for hundreds of years are indoctrinated into this sort of nonsense, and which explains a lot, from the content of the news and entertainment media, who are the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, and even how the 'community guidelines' of Facebook and other white social media is applied.  It is from this that we can understand the character of western arrogance and that of their 'freedom' movements and expectations of the world, or to the Swiss inbreds banning the burqa and niqab in favour the g-string and sexual promiscuity.  


So the west now outlaws words like 'tramp', 'slut', 'whore', 'cheap', 'slag', 'skank', 'bitch',  so that their women can't be judged for behaving worse than hookers.  It's all a part of their perverse Eurofeminist movement that equates freedom with being able to do all those things they complained about when men did it.  At least hookers do it because they need the money, but many western women do it because they got nothing else better to do.  In case you're wondering why i'm criticising the women and not the men is because WOMEN SHOULD KNOW BETTER.  Women are supposed, by nature and God, to be the best half of humanity.  They are the life-givers, the nurturers, the womb of the soul of humanity.  Why do you think God took a rib off Adam to make the woman?  It is symbolic of women being the protector - like a rib cage - of the man.  But western women are now celebrating killing babies in the womb as 'freedom'.  And that is the cornerstone of the evil that has now overwhelmed the west in the form of a whole load of other evils, from the white love of gore, sexual depravity, LGBT, prochoice, etc, etc. 


It is time the world stops treading around eggshells when it comes to the west and apply THEIR cultural standards to judge them, instead of always kneeling to western dictate and standards when the west knows nothing but itself and thinks everyone as just inferior civilisations who have to abide by what they say.  These degenerates get rid of religion so that they can take the place of God; they get rid of the idea of evil so that they can present it as good; they get rid of the idea of judgement so that they can't be judged; they concoct the idea of 'hate speech' so that their 'social media' can silence all oppositions to their evil.  

It is from the sexual depravity of western women and men from the 'hippie' screw-around-like-a-whore 1960s, that founded the basis for the contemporary depravity and arrogance of the western LGBT and all their other debased movements.  The world has avoided judging these degenerates for too long to the point that the world is now fast-losing its sense of judgement, and children across the world are being corrupted by the minute.  

By promoting LGBT indoctrination to children, that makes the only difference between a child-rapist and the LGBT, that of the latter getting children to do to each other what the former does himself.  The former does it against their will.  The latter tells them to make it a part of their will.

LGBT'S 'freedom to love' is just a synonym for 'the freedom to fuck any hole and pole available.'  They are the endpoint of a long western white history of not having a culture and fiddling with themselves to pass the time.  It is called debauchery, depravity, and makes you a downright degenerate open to anything from mass orgies to incest.  You can't hide behind the idea of 'love' to promote your unrestrained rampant lust for anything with a heartbeat.  It doesn't matter if you're such a nice person in other circumstances.  A child-rapist is also a nice person in other circumstances, and so is Hitler, Stalin, Churchill, and Biden.  By promoting LGBT indoctrination to children, that makes the only difference between a child-rapist and the LGBT, that of the latter getting children to do to each other what the former does himself.  The former does it against their will.  The latter tells them to make it a part of their will.  Promoting it to children means that sexualisation will start much sooner as they will not have to wait to get a person of the opposite sex, and in the course of it develop other traits and appreciation of the other because their sexual impulse cannot be immediately satisfied, but just go behind the bushes with their same-sex friend.  What the LGBT is promoting will lead to that.


If you aren't shy about your sin, at least shut the fuck up about it.  You have crossed the line when you start adopting children, and forcing schools and such to teach their children to go behind the bushes for a quickie with their own gender.  Don't pretend that you don't know that is going to be the result.  I am a first rate sinner myself, but like smoking, i don't think it right that i blow it in other's faces and compromise them.    

Practice a little hypocrisy so that your better potentials can be practiced and expressed and grow in the light of day and perhaps counter your evils.  There's nothing wrong with 'self-loathing', provided that you can appreciate the good in you as well, and not use it to justify that which you ought to loathe in yourself.  The purpose of guilt is not to make you hate yourself, but to enable you to distinguish the difference between good and evil.  That is true freedom.  The inverse is to not be able to tell the difference and be enslaved by sin.  I'm a devil myself, but unlike my compatriots, i've been blessed with a conscience to know my sin.  

BUT, you can't blame the LGBT



White people have been remaking God in their image for a few hundred years now - portrayal of Christ, having only white popes, Latin as a so-called 'holy language' (as if Latin wasn't used in Roman times to order pizzas to bargaining with hookers), etc.  The LGBT are the next in line for the western throne overseeing, or rather, dictating, the world's 'moral' progress, and dictating its terms from the wealth of their millennia-old global ignorance and self-absorption. 

So of course they'd insist that God loves whatever they like, just as their 'Christian' predecessors insisted that God loved colonialism, slavery, capitalism, etc, or how their popes would anoint the Roman Emperor, thus making him the Holy Roman Emperor that rules with God's blessing, or how even America itself does that today with their slogan, 'In God We Trust', and turning their presidential inauguration into some sort of pseudo-religious affair that just serves to enable them to 'prove' that God is on their side.  Hell, even that new dickhead of a saint, Newman, canonised by that white so-called Pope Francis, extolled the virtue of being enslaved by white people instead of eastern people.

"True, to enslave is a horrible sin. But comparative good may come out of sin in this sinful world.  American slavery admits the introduction of more antagonistic good, than African despotism.  I had rather been a slave in the Holy Land, than a courtier of Xerxes, or a soldier of Zingis Khan." - John Henry Newman, now 'Catholic' 'Saint'.  

As a catholic, i say unequivocally, Newman, along with their eurocentric white supremacist popes, can genuflect, kiss my brown ass, and then go say 10 Our Fathers and 25 Hail Mary's thereafter as penance for their white supremacist douchebaggery.  



So the moral of the story is, even when wrong, white is still right.  That is the sort of culturally inbred mentality white people are reared on since colonial times when they came up with the Great Chain of Being with White on top, and the Black right down below, and used that to justify the outright slaughter to slavery to exploitation of our people.  Don't hate them, but at the very least, be skeptical whatever such a people promote, and use each other's cultural standards to judge - one cultural standard is never enough, let alone the cultural standards of people who start global wars to global warming to global depravity.

But it's alright.  You can't blame white people for being the racists that most of them are, as they are brought up in a thoroughly eurocentric world.  Why else do you think they'd think that The Beatles to Bowie to Gaga were great 'artists'? Or think nothing of having only white popes, or having only whites, and the fascist chinese, in the UN Security Council?  "Father, forgive them, for they really got no clue what they are lacking, and don't have the multicultural attitude to undo it."  

So just as the European colonial attitude served as the foundation for the later rise of Nazism - which they will never tell you.  Likewise is the post-colonial attitude serving as the foundation for the arrogance of the western LGBT movement, along with their social media that quietly silences anyone who casts doubt on their superiority by implying that any of their beliefs are inferior.  

Using Malcolm X's words, they've had many 'chickens coming home to roost' for their attitude, from 9/11 to 7/7, etc, but they just don't seem to want to learn that being white doesn't make you right just because you say so.  Other cultural standards can be, and is, as equally proficient, deficient, and even superior to theirs in various aspects, and you don't have a greater right to life just because you aren't brown or black.  


The LGBT's attitude is a product of this sort of grossly eurocentric white supremacist attitude, arising from their white colonial and religious predecessors, and the view of the west that they are civilisation itself.  Their formula is simple - 1. what comes from the west is right, 2. what comes from the western young is more right than the western old.  It is this formula that is constantly applied insist that the world abide by their dictates.  They view that all others are there to 'follow' and 'like' them.  And if you don't, to be deleted on the basis of their (white supremacist) 'community guidelines'.  Don't be fooled.  Their 'community guidelines' purport to get rid of some of the devils amongst you so that they can play God themselves.  

So it's to be expected that the LGBT will ignore all other cultural standards, think they are right, and attempt to remake God in their image.  They'd soon be saying that Christ was repressed himself because him and his apostles didn't make a 'last supper' OF each other, and use that as a reason to discard a church that has so far refused to bend over to their debauched and depraved, oh sorry, 'sexually fluid', will.  

Sorry, but in MY culture, the LGBT in its sexually depraved western form with its sexually depraved historical antecedents, is viewed as 'depraved'.  Or are you saying that Indian culture is too inferior to judge yours?  I think there would be a population of more than the whole of the northern hemisphere to give you the finger for that.  And no, it is not for you to swivel on as you LGBTophiles might hope.


Poor God.


edX 

#lgbt 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Xingapore and Sinonazism in s.e.Asia

It's Chinglish, not Singlish.

Singaporeans upset about Indonesian naming ships after their ‘heroes’? Why?