on, LGBT Madness

"Elliot Page says having transition surgery has been a "life-saving" experience.

The Oscar-nominated star of Juno has opened up about coming out as a trans man in an interview with Oprah Winfrey.

The Canadian-born actor, 34, said having top surgery had allowed him to "feel comfortable in my body for probably the first time".

Top surgery involves the removal of the breast tissue to create a masculine chest."

So she's a 'him' now, according to the BBC article.  That's how Corporate Media tends to slip in its bias by recognising this girl as a guy.  Try to keep in mind that the BBC, amongst others, are Corporate-owned, and have ties to other corporate-owned news production houses.  News, in the hands of Corporate-owned media is an orchestrated production, meaning, of all that goes on, there is a bias on which to focus on, how to focus on it, whose opinions are to be presented, whose isn't, how it is to be presented, and what is to be left out.  It is propaganda borne of bias, intentional or otherwise. 


Identifying WITH vs Identifying AS

If a white boy was to feel disturbed that he isn't black because he 'identifies AS' Tupac or Ice Cube, or maybe Jimi Hendrix, and is almost on the verge of suicide before medical intervention enables his pigmentation to be changed to black, would you be celebrating it?  Or would you be calling for men in white suits with butterfly nets? 

Or would you stop your thinking process and go with the incontinent flow of depravity from the west by just saying that 'it is a matter of choice', 'it is a matter of preference', so live and let live?  Does insanity turn into 'a matter of choice' when more people embrace if for want of knowledge of anything else?

'Identifying WITH' is empathy, and normal.  'Identifying AS' is Norman Bates and Single White Female.  I'm not saying that LGBT are murderous psychopaths.  But theirs is a psychotic condition where empathy and identification is carried to the extreme.  It is like the electra complex where the daughter identifies with the mother to the point of forgetting her own identity, taking on the mother's, and wanting to bear the father's child - which LGBT, by the way, in principle approves with their 'love without limits' nonsense.  Don't call me homophobic, and i won't call you commonsenophobic.

If one needs to 'identify AS' instead of 'identifying WITH' THIS badly, it is a psychological condition, it is psychosis, it is one which requires some quiet and supervised time in the cuckoo's nest and requiring of a straight jacket to serve as an implement to correct their perspectival paraplegia. 

It is no different from, say, a person identifying as 'The Man from Atlantis', and being severely disturbed, having sleepless nights, having frequent bouts of emotionality, contemplating suicide, till he got his fingers surgically webbed and 'comes out' of the closet and into the fish tank as an amphibious swamp thing.  All that's left is for him to seek out a surrogate froggette to produce his progeny.

It is a bit syndrome isn't it.  A pinocchio syndrome.  I feel like a boy trapped inside a wooden toy.  I feel like a kermit trapped inside a man's body...ribbit!  I feel like chucky trapped inside a boy toy.  So if you get caught by the police pissing on a lampost, you can say, 'officer, i feel like a poodle trapped inside a man's body.'

What is all this 'trapped inside a' nonsense?  I bet if Page was born a boy, he'd want to slap on a couple of tits as he feels like a woman trapped inside a guy's body.  Or maybe if he was a fan of Total Recall, he might want to slap on triple tits.  

If you have the traits of a woman, marry it with your own character that's all.  I score high on both masculine and feminine traits myself - according to an 'androgyny' test i did at university in the UK - but should that lead me to feel like a bisexual or a hermaphrodite 'trapped inside' a guys' body or want to perform oral sex on both men and women?  How is that related?  I feel like a white man sometimes in my perspectives, but i don't feel like whitey trapped inside an indian body.  I also like Tupac, and NWA, but i don't feel like a black trapped inside an indian guy's body.  

You just take on laudable traits of people as you grow up, that's all.  How is any of that supposed to makes sense, or justify airtime on the telly, or censorious support from unelected capitalist Big Tech corporations who should just stick to producing stuff and shut the fuck up or else.    Why on earth should one like the traits of a woman and want to chop their cocks off?  Why on earth should one like the traits of a man and slice their tits off?  How is this madness receiving thumbs-up on the telly to indoctrination to children in schools?  My mother is my role model, but i don't see why respecting and emulating her traits should lead to my chopping my salami off and asking men to fuck my ass, which is what these LGBT crackpots are about in essence.  Looks like Arkham asylum had a mass breakout.  

It is a further progression from those small-breasted women who 'identify as' a woman with big breasts and have plastic stuffed into their breast pockets so that they can feel sane again - you need to get insane to get sane?  Less bad, but still silly, is the guy who identifies as a guy with a big dick and stuffs a salami in his pants.  LGBT are a further progression of this mild insanity. 


Mad is Mad whatever the population of Mad

The Devil never takes you from A to Z.  He just takes you to A and let's your desire to for more in life to take you to Z. 
But first, he makes sure you are ignorant of alternatives. 

So the west basically got put on a particular point of development, and just went with all there was in that direction for want of interest in any other direction that all the world's cultures, histories, wisdoms, sages, religions, philosophies, etc, put forth as an alternative to MacDonalds, The Beatles,  Gaga, and fucking anything that moves.

Yes, a person can do what he wants.   But it is still a psychological condition.  Just like an alcoholic who can do what he wants and drink himself to death.  Just because it is his choice doesn't make it sane.  The west's mad take on this is, if it is his choice, it is right.  It is the fetishisation of choice.  It turns it into a virtue itself, without looking at the content of the buffet.  That is logically out of the arse and straight into a happy meal. 

The west got it wrong.  The ability to choose, my dear boys and girls, is not proof of sanity, and neither is the magical number of 18. 

It is irrational obsessive compulsive behaviour, and the west is now 'addressing' this LGBT mental condition by telling everyone, including children, that it isn't a condition requiring psychiatric therapy, but an 'orientation' you are born with, or choose, or will adamantly not choose if you're a 'bigot' and a 'homophobe'.    So it's a matter of, 'if you're mad, just tell the sane people, especially when they are impressionable children, to join you so that you can use your numbers as proof that you aren't thinking out of your arse.'

My only problem with LGBT is not with what they do, but their efforts to normalise sexual consumerism and do away with all ideas, inquiries, and institutions, on decency, morality, and modesty.  It's like kids not wanting to go to school and insisting that all schools be burnt down.  If these kids were adults, they need to be resisted and opposed.  And if they want to go as far as shut down free speech to get their own way, they should be rounded up and incarcerated, along with those unelected bodies whom support their moves against free speech and thought.  Their actions are the greatest threat to democracy in human history, and treason against the people in favour of rampant and unabashed depravity.  I'm a sinner myself too, but my redemption lies in not confusing it for virtue.  They are attempting to take away our right, and the right of our children to engage in critical introspection, remorse, and change and 'just do it!'.  That just makes people easily controlled and manipulated by the Corporate Entertainment News and Social Media Alliance (CENSA).

Before i go, a question.  Who the hell is this Oprah anyway?  How is she an authority on anything?  One has to be as thick as whale's backside to confuse her shallow observations on everything to be worth more than a bob or two.  I think quotes from Bugs Bunny might be more enlightening. 

fare thee well,

edX