Covid. A Tale of 3 Cities.

Covid. A Tale of 3 Cities.  a general conspiratorial overview.

This is a Conspiratorial take on this event.   It may not be a conspiracy.  But since i have no hard proof that it is just a coincidence, it could therefore be true.

Curtain up...

1. Fool Manchu

CHINA may or may not be the source of the virus, but what it certainly is, is the first source of the manufacturing of global expectation-management and paranoia production for the global premiere of, 'Jab or Else!'.  The musical will be sure to follow.

Expectations had to be produced.  And China was the best one for the role.  They had a compliant 'I'll do as I'm told' population, like the chinese in the rest of asia, so the production would go smoothly and people across the globe would be taught about what this is about (the virus), what fears they ought to have (that many will die and there are no remedies for it), and how they should behave when it was their turn (do as they are told, lockdown, and blame each other).

If it wasn't for that, and if it was to happen in the west first,  or the UK for instance, the claimed death tolls, the lockdowns, etc, would have come under greater scrutiny by the more thoughtful and intelligent British population, and the whole project would be compromised.

So China had to be the first.  And a scapegoat as well.  One of the purposes of a scapegoat is not just someone or something to blame a problem on,  but a reason to believe the problem exists.  I'll explain further below.


2. The White Man's Burden

THE WEST had to be the second.  If the imposition of, and desensitisation to, corporate and governmental fascism is one of the goals for this show, the more activistic west will have to be the first to be subdued so as to quell global skepticism in the face of all that is to take place.  He had to be bent, pretzelised, made to succumb.  That was his burden as an example to the world.

So the government in the UK, the US, etc, were purposely lax so that the loose border controls could be blamed for an alleged Great White Spike.  I thought at that time that it was absolutely ridiculous that they would make mistakes like that,  and realised that it was on purpose.  But i couldn't figure out why.   Like i said above, if people can find a believable source for an imagined problem, they'll imagine the problem to be believable.  Great sleight-of-hand huh.

Once people can find a source of blame, they'll not scrutinise the problem itself.  If i can tell someone that they have a disease, and immediately point at the cause, they'll not seek a second opinion of whether they actually have the disease in the first place, or inquire after how bad it is.  They'll believe everything i have to say about the disease, what they ought to do, etc, etc.  

So it's like, they keep borders open, let in loads from highly infected countries, then you will believe that you have an epidemic when they tell you that, even if you don't.  Genius isn't it.  

The west also tends to be overvalued in the eyes of the yet-to-be decolonised in the world.  So if they suffer a major affliction, the rest of the world will pay attention and fear along with them. 

If the whiteman can be afflicted, so can the rest.  If the whiteman can go quietly along with all the measures, the rest won't question as much.  It becomes a case of the whiteman having a tummy ache and the rest of the world running to the toilet.  That's post-colonial western hegemony for you.  And it was used with great results.

BUT,

3. From Jai Hind! to Jab Hind!

INDIA was the fly in the conspiratorial ointment.  Their death tolls being exceedingly low suggested that it might be a white problem after all - i personally had many Indian nationals saying that to me from the very beginning.  They weren't exhibiting the necessary paranoia after the Wuhan outbreak.  They weren't rushing for the newly arrived vaccine.  Close to a year had passed and they were doing fine.   They were brushing it off like little inconsequential crumbs of poppadoms off their homespun garments.

And besides this, studies were piling up in the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, funded by the US government) done by Indian scientists extolling the virtues of various traditional Indian remedies having 'prophylactic' value against Covid through its ability to reduce inflammation and other factors that led to symptomatic and severe infections. 

The BBC, WHO, Facebook, were doing their best to ensure such troublesome 'misinformation' were either silenced when the peasantry spoke about it, or kept out of the news.  India as a whole had to be ruled out as anything but a rape capital (though rape stats show that America has close to 20 times more of such incidents), and where idiocy was so endemic that people ate cow dung and washed it down with cow piss as a preventative measure, when they weren't raping everything that moved that is.   The western press resolutely went in search for such news so that death tolls could climb, and the world will be left with no viable alternative to the upcoming 'vaccine'. 

But India, like indian cows in the middle of the road looking nonchalantly at the traffic that weaved around them, just blinked  and ignored it all.  Instead, they went to their cauldrons of curried whatnot for preventive and therapeutic remedies, as they had been doing for more than 5000 years, thanks to their ancient Ayurvedic science.

Western papers began grumbling that the global take-up for vaccines was not flourishing due to Indian paranoia-hesitancy, um, i mean, vaccine-hesitancy.  Western papers were hoping, i mean, speculating, that the Khumb Mela festival attended by millions without any safe-distancing in India in JANUARY would lead to a spike.  

(look at the date)

It didn't.  

Though the ongoing Khumb Mela festival was later blamed for the spike some months later, thus denying the science that incubation was at most 2 weeks.  Why wasn't there a spike after millions attended it in January?  Nobody asked.

(look at the date)

Efforts were made to push the Indians to say 'ahhhh' to the vaccine so that the rest of the world would do so.  Indians, instead, said,  'namaste no thank you very much for your most kind and gracious offer of this preventive condiment but it doesn't go well with our curries', without taking a breath.  Even Indian doctors were refusing to take it citing its experimental nature. 

So they were awarded a Spike via an Operation Delta. 

The result, the indians rushed in droves to make a happy meal out of the vaccine, and the rest of the world followed suit.  

Now, it was made clear that nobody was immune. No cuisine could save you.  The human immune system was useless without external billion-dollar inoculatory intervention.  The Indians could take their curries and stuff it.  The only thing that could rescue them was a vaccine that could give them antibodies to a virus they already had developed antibodies to, after over a year and a half of exposure.

Stories raged about bodies washing up on different river banks, mass cremations.  Not that such events could be planned.  Not that people who died from other causes had their bodies directed to hotspots for mass cremations.  Not that people didn't die from other causes at that time.   Not that all this could be orchestrated by well-meaning individuals who did so so as to encourage vaccination for an ailment they had been led to believe would be the end of Indian civilisation of they didn't get vaccinated. 

You see, a conspiracy doesn't need lots of people to be in on it. It just needs lots of people to believe it to be true, or to lie with the best of intentions.  This principle applies to people on both sides of the divide, be they on the Corporate or Skeptical side.

So India 🇮🇳 fell.


The Aftermath of the Indian Fall in Asia

Most of the following data is pulled from, world life expectancy. I verified with another site as well - champion traveller.  These sites in turn pull their data from WHO, etc.  However, when i followed the link to the WHO page, no country stats were supplied. Other country-by-country data links led to a empty pages.  When i clicked related links, it brought me to a page that stated that the WHO site has been revamped.  Either the former 2 sites are supplying erroneous data, or the WHO has taken off such information so as to disable comparison to Covid.  I've written to the people behind the first aforementioned site for clarification.

In singapore, where the death toll from influenza stands at about 900 a year, the fact that the death toll from cv19 was 37 after a year and a half, still sent the chinese frantically extending an arm of trust to the vaccine by the millions - though the delta variant has todate claimed at most about a life or two, of any.

The chinese abide by the principle of, 'paranoia is better than thought' (known as 'kia xi-ism' - 'afraid of death' or 'overly and irrationally cautious' - arising from their governments imposing penalties on the people for questioning or challenging them, and imposing irrational and unethical laws on them for 2000 years, thus severely compromising the chinese ability to think critically and objectively).  

Hence, the government is now able to use the high vaccination figures to impose draconian measures on those refusing the vaccine to force them to do so, knowing that the compliant outnumber the decree-hesitant.  It's even attained insane proportions where people can be thrown into prison for not returning their teacup in coffeeshops for a 3rd time,  alleging it can spread the virus, unless they pay the government close to USD $1800 to not be imprisoned, etc.,(typical chinese triad-style extortionate behaviour) knowing full well that age-old chinese apathy and mitual alienation will enable them to do so with impunity - which is why singapore's chinese PMs have always preferred maintaining a chinese majority as no other asian race is as highly adept at the fearsome martial art of kow-towism.  Exemplary people aren't they.

Similar restrictive measures have been implemented in Malaysia, where in 2018, about 14,000 died from influenza and pneumonia, while in the one and a HALF years of covid, there were 8,000 covid-related deaths.  And yet, the whole nation is being pushed toward the needle.

Even in the Philippines, their president, Pooterte, i mean, Duterte, could even threaten the entire population with prison if they didn't vaccinate.  Where, pray tell, is this genius going to find the space to imprison about 85% of the population?  I don't think his living room is big enough.  Putang ina mo.  

The deaths from Covid in the Philippines, in a year and a HALF, stands at 27,000.  In 2018 alone, 12 months, the deaths from Influenza and pneumonia was 75,000.  Despite this fact,  covid is deemed a far greater danger, and unvaccinated are threatened with house arrest.  How did a certifiable moron get into power?

Vietnam has been congratulated for 'successfully containing' the epidemic for more than a year.  So what?  You either have a huge outbreak, or you have 'successfully contained' it?  Why isn't anyone considering the probability that everyone has it or had it,  and emerged fine and fit?  How successful can Vietnam be in containing Covid when their death toll from the allegedly less dangerous influenza claimed more than 16,000 lives in 2018, but their death toll from Covid over one and a HALF years is 787???  They are rubbish at withstanding or preventing the 'less dangerous' flu, but are Superviet when it comes to preventing covid?   It seems that every step of the way, efforts is made to divert attention from the efficacy of the human immune system and just credit governments for keeping infection rates down.

In Thailand, Covid death toll over 18 months is 4500, while their death toll from influenza in 2018 was very similar numerically to Covid death toll, but you have to add an additional 0 - 45,000.

In Cambodia, Covid is said to have claimed 1300+ lives in 18 months, while influenza in 2018 took 7500 lives. 

Only in Indonesia,  we see a reversal of the figures, with Covid allegedly claiming 90,000 lives in 18 months,  and influenza taking half of that in 2018 in 12 months.  The strange thing is that they were largely unscathed for a long while,  and then a spike?  Their immune systems suddenly decided to pack up and go for the Haj did it? 

BUT, Covid is Still More Dangerous Alright!

But the notion that Covid is more widespread and dangerous than influenza is still imposed. 

It is said that the flu had taken a dive since Covid came-a-calling.  Really?  People stopped dying from influenza and decided to start dying from Covid instead?  Or is it that influenza deaths are being counted as covid deaths because of the highly reliable PCR tests, many of which the FDA has now recalled for being terribly inaccurate?  

After all, if death tolls on average for influenza is supposed to remain similar, and if just about everyone have been infected by covid, wouldn't that mean that covid is a coincidental affliction and that influenza is the real killer of that yearly number whom are supposed to die from influenza?  

Were allegedly Covid-deaths tested for the flu virus?  Or is it that masks kept out the influenza virus, but let in the allegedly more deadly Covid?  Well, that is possible i suppose.  Covid is said to be more deadly, so it must have taken over from the flu and started killing more.   But wait a minute, if that is the case, why are asian death rates way below previous flu fatalities?   

Sorry mate, but death tolls from Covid vs Influenza in almost all southeast asian states point to influenza being the more dangerous of the two.  Let's not forget that lockdowns in Asia came quite a long while after the virus made its premiere.  Remember how quickly it spread in Wuhan?  

So it is not implausible to assume that the virus already reached epidemic status in these tightly-packed asian states, with their tightly-packed transportation, their tightly-packed eateries, their tightly-packed shopping centres, their tightly-packed work places, their tightly-packed housing systems.....i think you get my point.

All the initial hospitalisation cases were thought to be the first cases in Asia and the rest of the world.

However, it is equally probable that these were the more extreme cases in a population that was actually already widely infected.  And the same applies to the rest of the world. 

This is argued for by the fact that in singapore, for instance, most of the identified cases were foreign indian workers.  But what happened was that a few were found to be infected, and then all foreign indian workers were tested.  But no equivalent checks were done on locals.  

related article: singapore's flawed covid approach

A country with a history of preferring the chinese as a majority, and having only Chinese PMs, claiming all progress to be of chinese origins, predictably, happily and illogically assumed it was an Indian problem.  When it first allegedly broke out in china, and there were reports of discrimination against the chinese, the chinese in china and singapore were saying that the virus wasn't racially biased and the chinese shouldn't be discriminated against.  But when the foreign indian workers were tested and found to be infected, suddenly, the virus was thought to have a racial preference?  Very smart indeed.  Typical.

And this sort of approach fed the myth that government measures, contact-tracing, etc, per se had somehow protected the largely chinese population from infection, and no thought was paid to the very real possibility that the infection had passed from the chinese to the indians, or that the infection would have spread across the locals as quickly as it did amongst the Indians.  

They didn't consider the fact that most of the indians whom were infected did not need hospitalisation.  Only a minuscule proportion of them required it.  That indicated that asymptomatic infection and recovery far outpaced symptomatic infection and hospitalisation.  

But what was touted was 'government measures' keeping infection rates down, and, countries like china and singapore were held up as shining examples to follow. (I said all of this a year ago)  My English relatives were telling me what a great job the singapore government was doing,  and i kept telling then what i have said here.  But nobody listened.

Hence, the same false logic was applied across the whole world.  It was impressed upon the people that if you aren't terribly sick, it's because you haven't caught it yet, not that most people would just sniff a bit and then carry on.  The lockdowns were essential in reinforcing this myth.  It gave the impression that the virus wasn't already amongst most people; government measures were protecting them; and the only way they were going to survive it was to await the vaccine.  To do otherwise was to court death.

I suppose these lockdowns were necessary as a precaution, but it was also taken to mean that most had not been afflicted, and just fed to amplify the hallowed and transcendent glow of the vaccine at the end of the long and dismal tunnel of social isolation.  

But the death tolls were astronomical in the west. In India, when the death toll was about 100 per million population, in the UK, it was said to be approaching 2000 per million population, and in the US, 1500 per million population.  This either means that white people have monumentally rubbish immune systems, or their covid-related deaths aren't.  It really doesn't make scientific sense that infection and death rates would climb quicker and be more deadly in the west than in the southeast.  In fact, given the tightly-packed nature of asia, and frequent travels of the china chinese into asian states, and vice versa, and frequent travels of other asians in and out of these regions, it should have been the other way round.  But till today, their influenza deaths of the past is mostly far worse than Covid.

Asia has all the makings of a greater epidemic than the west.  If it is reversed, then, like i said, either western immunity systems require a battery change, or their death tolls, or cause of death, are suspect.

Makes one think doesn't it.  Well, it should. If you aren't, then it's a wonder that you can use buttons and zippers.

Oh, before i forget. The death toll from covid in the past year and a HALF, that is, 18 months, in India,  if we take the PCR tests conducted there as 100% accurate, is just over 400,000.  The death toll from Influenza and pneumonia for the year 2018, 12 months, was 616,000.  If anyone wants to say that covid deaths are underreported, the same thing could be said of influenza and pneumonia deaths, you silly little tellytubby you.   So yeah, Covid is still far deadly despite facts and figures.  Alrighty then.  If you insist.  By your command. 

Misinformation Inc.

You know, i have to wonder how many of these covid-related deaths were actually influenza deaths. So the BBC, Reuters, etc, with reference to India, were talking about mass crematoriums fires, bodies washing up all over the place, people collapsing everywhere, but that didn't happen for the more life-taking flu?  I say 'life-taking' because we are supposed to accept that Covid is more 'dangerous', and the phrase, ' more dangerous', cannot be used with reference to the relatively people-friendly flu.

So covid is far worse than influenza.  Right.  Such information is from the BBC, WHO, CDC, amongst others.  So what matters is the source of information, not facts right.   I wonder why the 'fact-checkers' are strangely silent on this.

All efforts have been made from day 1 to impress upon the world population that covid is more deadly by, 

- refusing to consider that many or all humans may have been infected already and turned out fine and which would make death rates far less severe in numerical significance if the whole world was assumed to have been infected and survived;

- attributing low death rates in certain regions to government measures and not the immune system when there was reason to plausibly believe that infection would be extensive;

- silencing, or being silent about, scientifically ascertained alternative preventive and therapeutic measures and which wouldhave kept death rates down;

- Likening people's efforts to produce remedies to the most ridiculous ones so as to get people to dismiss themselves as a source of remedies;

- Shutting down sites, accounts, videos, articles, that question the official variant of what's going on;

- Shutting down sites, pages, accounts, videos, discussing or serving as a support group for people whom have had, or whose family have had, adverse reactions suffeted deaths after the vaccine;

- Failing to test people for antibodies before vaccination, thus falsely attributing declining reported infection and death rates to the vaccine;

- releasing the vaccine at a time when it could be argued that most people would have antibodies already, so as to falsely present the vaccine as the reason for falling infection or death rates;

- Constantly failing to acknowledge the high probability that identified infection numbers are just a small number compared to the rest of the population whom may be infected but are fine;

- dismissing all post-vaccine adverse reactions and deaths as coincidental unless those reactions are mild, and in which case, they would be acknowledged as vaccine-related;

And many others.

If i was to do a university sociological or psychological experimental assignment with a 3rd of these flaws as an undergraduate, my lecturer would have reviewed my university application and qualifying credentials for fake information.


That's All Folks

The world has now been put on a chinese trajectory in perspectival development, whereby rules matter more than reason, instilling unquestioning subservience to authority, and the suspension of reason in favour of the privilege and relief of social mobility.  

Whether the vaccine prevents anything or not, people have been confined long enough to appreciate its being able to relieve them from the ailment of cabin fever. 

Civilisation has moved from the Cartesian, 'I think therefore i am', to, 'i vaccinate therefore i can go to the pub.'  As for thinking,  that's just for conspiracy whackjobs and non-eurocentric sociologists...like myself.

China, the UK, and India.  These 3 played crucial roles in the play up to now.  It probably would not have worked if their roles were reversed.  Just as viruses can mutate to form stronger variants, so has the progression of this play mutated to anticipate and counter any opposition, if not with the strength of argument, most certainly with the consistency of censorship unparallelled since the first home PC was introduced.  I wonder if there is a jab for that.

The End

edX