civilisationReview

I think the basic point most do not get is that its been 2 years.  The American Flu of 1918 did its global rounds in a far less mobile world within 18 months and everyone got natural immunity then.   If any region in the world is largely uninjected now, and are fine, that serves as evidence that the human immune system is robust in its function and not needing of any highly profitable, suspiciously life-threatening, with unknown or undisclosed short-term, long-term, and epigenetic effects, and highly ineffective, remedy being passed off as a 'vaccine.'   It is basically a remedy where you can count how many times it didn't work, but never how many times it did work.  Africa is evidence that the latter might very well indicate that it is of insignificant efficacy because it wasn't required to be put to work for Africans to be fine.  So, to push for injections being passed as the only remedies to a problem ignores the remedy that ...

So long as one person can die because of it, or one person can get sick despite taking it, saying it is 'safe and effective' and the 'benefits outweigh the risks' is the biggest misinformation of all.   Aren't lotteries sold with the encouraging, 'it could be you!' even if there is only one or a few top prizes?  How is this any different, except that there are much more 'winners' with the death lottery. If it is true that any ONE of EVERYone can die because of it, it is more of a Death Lottery than a Vaccine. This is evidenced by the risk of the former being more certainly quantifiable than the benefits of the latter. Hence, to coerce this is enforced enrollment in a death lottery and premeditated grievous bodily harm and murder. edX

It appears that if something is called a 'vaccine', it is excused if some, or even numerous, die after taking it. But if it is called a 'health supplement', and even one person dies, it is immediately banned, or people are warned, or it is suspended pending hard proof that it is not responsible. LIKE a health supplement, this 'vaccine' does not confer immunity; it MAY help in reducing the severity of illness; it does not stop transmission. But how it may be distinguished from the 'vaccine' is that... ... unlike a health supplement, it can carry a higher post-exposure risk of immediate death, delayed death, stroke, myocarditis, pericarditis, miscarriages, paralysis, blindness, blood clots, amputations, has been associated with worsening preexisting conditions, is able to inflict illness in the recipient that may then serve as the preexisting conditions that can be worsened by the 'covid' virus or other viruses or ailments, along ...