The Virtue of Femininity and the Myth of Patriarchy

The Virtue of Femininity and the Myth of Patriarchy


Prologue

Don't you notice how the bbc, Netflix, Hollywood, and basically most of white or western media, is always portraying heterosexual relationships as intrinsically bad, and men as generally problematic? And promoting lgbt on the other hand?  And promoting 'feminism'? They take pains and pleasure to ensure you know the word, misogyny, but not the word misandry.  You can see many an 'entertainment' from the west where men are just evil, abusive, exploitative, etc, but you don't see much exploring the good man in various contexts in white productions.  They had it, but it was gradually whittled away as they realised whatever is being said in this article, and how the media could be used to effect their aims. Hence, all the Little House on the Prairie, Waltons-style shows in the west were gradually replaced with rubbish like Friends to The Big Bang Theory. 

Back in the past, the theme was 'men are bad'. Then, 'men are bad or stupid'. Then it became,  'marriage to men is bad'. From there, it was, 'the homosexual man is better, but they are only for men not women.' Then, 'you are better off marrying your own gender'. Like a rat gnawing at your toe, bit by bit till it has your whole leg.  Evil knows how to take its time to do what it does.  

Patriarchy? If anything, it has been elite hatred of men for ages for rattling their cages to producing wise anti-establishment sages.  It has been an elitist war against the real Man all this time.  And now they are using women as their foot soldiers via the LGBT and Eurofeminist bowel movements.

The space between the lines is the silence of what's unsaid that makes the lines more of a noose than the news.

People tend to not realise that the intended target when it comes to corporate/elitist ploys is many a time not the one in the line of fire, but the one who seems to NOT be so, and who appears to be the one to gain from it.  In this case, the putting men down, or culling masculinity, allows the shallow women produced by the system to feel good in contrast to, and at the expense of men, when the final target is woman.  Simply, man can't be emasculated and depoliticised till women are defeminised and dematernalised.

They have an insidious agenda that stretches from misandry, to promoting lgbt and sexual promiscuity, demonising global cultures, religions, and philosophies, and in favour of Eurocentrism, corporations, pharmaceutical companies and the youth in the west that they have been grooming for a couple of decades to serve as a global moral(free) corporate-led consumerist exemplar.   There is an underlying theme that leads them to leave out tanker loads of news, and only present a near-sighted bird's eye view on things.  

While people have been learning to put up with the elite, the elite have been learning how to put them down, for good.


Patriarchy is a Myth

Much of patriarchy as an oppressive institution is a myth when you consider the great variation in different global cultures and look at it logically.   It wasn't largely, and was certainly not a global reality or effort to stifle women.

The invention of Hollywood, however, enabled the mass indoctrination of the masses where the instance could be presented as the general. Where one cultural norm can be promoted as better than the rest of the world. Where the sins of some white men or some men can be blamed on all men.  Where women can be brainwashed from childhood to view self-sacrificing love for the family as oppressive whilst finding freedom in being used and abused by the corporation.  Where slaving for the corporation becomes the reason for life.  Where people are distracted from the evils of the elite whom tell them to blame a 'patriarchy', MEN, instead of the system and elite who turn everyone who reports to it, be they men or women or child, into slaves who are gradually underdeveloped to deny all identity to the point that they think nothing of murdering babies for a 'career'.  

Men traditionally went to work to feed their babies. Now, the 'liberated' 'woman' neglects or kills babies to feed the corporation and get some perverse sense of 'fulfillment'.

To promote something, just ignore all that is contrary to it in the world, focus on its worst manifestations, feed the young with this sort of thing, and that's it. And they do it over and over again, and incrementally generation after generation, till society is completely transforned into a form that doesn't think twice queueing up for an injection simply because those who profit the most from it, and who have every reason to sicken them and kill them said so, without question.  It is within this context we should understand how the idea of 'patriarchy' was invented and moulded by the western elite to relieve themselves of blame, while getting rid of all that opposed them - masculinity, femininity, the family, and through that, the very identity of Humanity itself.

Patriarchy? What Patriarchy?

Patriarchy is incidental, not causal. In other words, the 'oppressive tyrannical patriarchal rule of men' was basically men determining things in the arena of their preoccupation, which is the field wherein they worked FOR their families outside of their homes.  It's as simple as that.  There is eltism along all kinds of lines, but patriarchy is as real as monarchs only being men.  Men went out to work FOR their families, so they made the decisions in the external working arena, which also involved all directly related matters, including politics.  Women had nothing to do with it, so they weren't directly relevant to these proceedings.  That's logic. Not oppression.  

In the home, things were matriarchal, where women took care of their homes, children, and all pertaining to it.  Nobody generally was excluding anyone. Nobody generally was oppressing anyone.  Women were not being enslaved, but being of great help and significance in keeping humanity and its humanity alive, while men kept its stomach full.  That's logic. Not oppression.

This whole approach of thinking it 'slavery' to be married, to be taking care of children, parents, grandparents, community, is a significantly corporate-led effort to relocate the great maternal asset to humanity to corporate use.  This sort of thinking only comes about when people are perverted to believe that WORK is not the MEANS to Life, but the REASON for it.  It is this dehumanising shift that gave rise to people seeking work as a form of identity, a self-defining preoccupation, an aspiration, a 'career', and subscribing to the subsidiary identity of consumer, serial sexual promiscuity, and rest when they are not doing any of these.  

In the past, men slaved for the family. It was a labour of love. Women took care of the family and community. It was a labour love.  All the proceeds from their efforts went to the family, the community.  They were defined by this, and the culture that was built up as a celebration and aid to this. 

Then the corporation gradually takes over everything, demands more intellectual effort within the corporate space.  Instead of more intellectual and creative effort for and within the community, it was transferred to corporate use.  Culture slowly withered. Children were bred for corporate use through 'education' and deculturalisation (getting rid of all culture that contradicted the self-serving corporate agenda).  

Women were thus left feeling a sense of loss, of non-identity within a community and family that gradually had its intellectual, creative, and spiritual impulses moved for corporate use.  What was she nurturing?  What was she expending her labour of love, but for corporate-use through her husband and children whom were themselves now working, not for the family or community, not for the community through art, music, philosophy, religion, spirituality, but purely for the Corporation, whilst thus being made to disregard ALL aspects of their wondrous human potentials that were not of use to the Corporation.  

And THAT is when she begins to feel the void within the home and community.  And that is when the only avenue for relevance appeared to be the corporation.  And that is when she begins to rear her children for corporate use, and her daughters, not being reared for more, will themselves find the very idea of motherhood, or even Womanhood, or femininity, to be not only superfluous, but even abhorrent.  They'll even begin to view being married, or even being a woman as 'patriarchal oppression' instead of the only means to fight corporate oppression.

That is when anything that stands in the way of 'a career' becomes oppression, and that is when the family, love, humanity, children, spirituality, and the overall Sanctity of Life itself becomes superfluous..... to the point that they can't even see that 'vaccine' coercion is premeditated murder of a percentage of every father, mother, brother, sister, child, and babe in the womb.  That is when woman becomes an abomination.  That is when the woman, the 'career woman, who has now made a career out of not being a woman, becomes the dragon that plucks the child away as soon as it is conceived or born and devours it.

It is when people descend to being nothing more than man and woman, as opposed to the identity of father, mother, brother, sister, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother, all of which bespeaks a relationship, a different responsibility, a different kind of love, a means through which the best principles of all cultures, religions, philosophies, of history is expressed through these various identities,  it is these various relational identities that make us love more, and in different ways, and thus appreciate our identities as men and women, love, lives, and therefore life itself, far more than we otherwise would.  Without it, the identity of man and woman itself becomes superfluous.

THAT is when they lose their entire value for life itself, and become sexually debauched, consumers, 'career' people, and nothing other than mere fodder for the Leviathan, the Corporation.  And in such circumstances, depravity advances as people seek to FEEL through that as there is nothing of meaning to put a smile on their faces that can last. That is when they use each other for sex to getting a thrill from each other's dismemberment in 'entertainment'. Any wonder why such evils is culture in the west? 

So,  it is in this perverse scenario that we see this unabashed and brazen corporate effort to get women to mother the corporate profit margins, kill their child, or get a divorce to do it, and call THAT a 'career'.  The baby is seen as a patriarchal tool of oppression.  It is seen as holding back the 'progress of women', 'the quest for equality', 'the fight for women's rights' as a whole.   The whole idea of progress is relocated from fulfillment as a mother to self-definition as a corporate slave where most of one's contribution is taken away for corporate use and the slave discarded, or killed through a host of means when not required.  And THAT is not oppression?  

Whatever women were doing for the family, children, and community, transfer THAT to corporate use. Then the woman is 'free'.  And the western elitists have been gradually promoting this via their 'entertainment' since the 1930s - as i have witnessed through my quite extensive collection of western movies dating back to as early as the 1920s.  I'm not saying the western elite has constructed all of this. I'm saying that they know how to recognise an opportunity, and over time, they will see the interconnections between sociocultural variables and start to manipulate them and construct others via the highly potent tools of media, the curriculum, and corporate demands.

to continue...

Work was dirty. It was self-abnegating. There were the vagaries of nature to contend with, exploitation from elitists, wars, etc. One does not emerge from this unscathed.  But one does it for the family.  The Holy Family. As it was the family that made this worthwhile, while making both men and women much more through this pure labour of love. And within the family it is the woman, the grandmother, the mother, the wife, all playing the role of keeping alive and right the spirit of humanity in its pure form, untainted by worklife, losses, competition, warring, and all the negative attitudes, recuperative or compensatory pastimes, and behaviours that is engendered  by being exploited by the elite in the work arena.  

It was, and is, The Women, in all her feminine self-sacrificing living glory that served as a baptismal fount reinstating the spirit of men when he returned every night.  And that is what served as a foundation upon which masculinity went on to take issue with the elite through the generations.  Simply, the self-sacrificing, nurturing, unconditionally loving natural nature of women served as a stark contrast to the evil out there and this gave rise to the angst of man in the face of injustice. Any wonder why the elite have been demonising the family?  

In many parts of the world, it was a division of labour based, naturally, on innate proclivities. (I fail to see how a woman should think it sane to bemoan being born a woman, while happily embracing a life long 'career' as a stock broker or a mechanic.  It just indicates a gradual movement to seeing all life as purposed to serve the corporation.  A complete and utter self-abnegating evolution that renders one devoid of all humanity. ) And many a time it was defined by the economy, with great variation between pastoral vs agricultural economies. 

Not ALL societies were carnivorous, hankering after pillage and plunder, constantly warring, or forming cultures to entire television or literary series to extol the dubious virtues of an equally dubious claim to being a civilisation.  You will find that oppression, be it male or otherwise is pronounced maribor in such civilisations.  And when such 'civilisations', being as carnivorous and belligerent as they were and are, become militarily and politically ascendant, you will find their people naturally and arrogantly assuming that ALL civilisations, men,  women, everything, is as THEY have experienced it.  

And that is when the whole myth of their self-constructed version of reality is perpetuated as if that was the full breadth, width, length, and depth of ALL humanity's history.  It is on such nonsensical bases that we also find emerging the myth of 'patriarchy', along with their meaning of 'feminism', 'liberalism', and all other 'isms' according to THEIR experience of history,  their fouling it up, their attempt to produce solutions, WHILE, leaving the foundations of their civilisation unquestioned as that would just serve to call their claim to being superior into more than a tad bit into question.

Amman

In South india for instance, it was largely equal or in some respects, matriarchal.  That didn't mean that men were oppressed.  And neither did patriarchy mean that women were oppressed. It just meant that men did most of the economic work and warring, whilst women kept their purity, and through that,  humanity's humanity alive by reminding men that humanity meant more than economics and warring.   And they accomplished this via the love and self-sacrifice they gave the men when they returned after a day of being a crash test dummy for the elite, or competing with each other, or suffering and toiling under the volatile vagaries of nature.  The humanity they learnt through the love of their mothers and wives was passed on back to society through cultural, philosophical, and religious development, and of course, fighting with the elite.  

One could say that the Indian version of 'the mummy's boy' is one who ferociously takes issue with the world when it is not as loving as his mother.  That is when he becomes an incarnation of a mother ferociously fighting for her child.  That is a sort of 'gender fluidity' based on empathy as opposed to the western variant of unadulterated debauchery.

That is why, in India, and especially in the agrarian south India, elitism had to be mindful of the spiritual sector to a great degree, and which was why they couldn't oppress the people as much as they might otherwise - like in the northern white hemisphere, or the sinosphere.  That is why the humble holy man occupied a greater position of respect than the wealthy businessman, and it was not unheard of for princes and kings to give up their thrones for a life of asceticism in search for a greater meaning in life - one doesn't find such a parallel in western 'progressive' history does one.   And all of these have maternal or feminine origins for its inspiration.  That, my dear wee lads and ladies, is REAL feminism, the Indian brand of feminism, where women are the true Kingmakers through their love and sacrifice which to men serves as a contrast to evil in any form in the world outside of The Holy Family.

And in quite a few agricultural economies, it led to a growth of philosophies, religions, wisdoms, that led to beautiful meanings and reasons being discovered for the division of labour by gender, and also producing a whole host of rituals and practices that celebrated this.  

Simply, men were subjected to sin daily by his conflict with others or nature to feed his family, while women were protected from this impurity to nurse and nurture his soul upon his return. 

The white Eurofeminist movement, however,  wants to simply subject women to the selfsame impurity under the guise of 'equality' while that in effect gets rid of purity in the guise of being about parity.  Then, the only means by which men would be able to have their humanity reinstated would be gone and all humanity thus dehumanised so that the corporation can finally be free of all opposition and rule in perpetuity.  Eurofeminism is the bane of civilisation, to say the least. 

All in All

The War Between Heaven and Hell

You oft hear the ridiculous mantra in the west, 'work, rest, play, repeat'.  Well, the prior one throughout human history was, 'work, be rejuvenated by women, live the cultural life, fight the elite, rest, repeat'.  

You could say that the entirety of human history in all parts of the world was basically a protracted war between Heaven and Hell.  Women were, in effect, the true constructors of the human civilisational constitution by way of impressing upon their children and husbands the value of love and self-sacrifice by being its living example.   This led men to recognise, be upset about, and therefore contend with, its absence in the outside world and thus be a perpetual intractable and deepening thorn in the buttenheimer of the elite.  It all starts with women, and in particular, the mother, and then continues with one's wife.  

The true women is the one who nutures humanity within the child,  and this evolves to Reason and Empathy, the 2 pillars of true democracy, and which in turn leads to the development of religion, music, philosophy, and the sciences.  Women were the Adam's Rib, designed to protect the vital organs, the heart, of Humanity. That's why she was entrusted with so much blame in the Biblical story of Eve being time one to bring about their eviction from the Garden through her talking Adam into taking the fruit of the Forbidden Tree.  It wasn't a 'blame game' that villifies women, but illustrates the great moral power of women. 

Why on earth do you think that there are many derogatory terms for a woman who behaves in a sexually debauched manner, or who betrays her family, aborts, or exhibits any traits of the worse of men?   It is subconscious, but it it is viewed as a betrayal of humanity, and the beginnings of the end of civilisation itself when a woman seeks to be dirtied as the worst of men are by the system as then, there will no distinction between good and evil itself.  

Like i said a while back, the Heavens gave us the Mother, so that the Mother may open our eyes to the Heavens.

Right to Vote

Paradoxically, white women, fighting for, and being given the 'right to vote' actually disempowered women and scored a major permanent victory for the elite.  This indicated a gradual societal perversion of perception via the gradual identification of men with 'work' instead of,  and for, the family, in the west. 

Women, thus, were thereon led, or more accurately,  forced,  to choose between existing evils, and accept them, rather than refrain from such a 'right', as in 'right to vote', and continue to give their families, children, and husbands uncompromised and untainted love so that the men will go out and create better parties that were less of a contradiction of their experience of love within the home. In other words, the 'right' to vote basically dirtied women.  It made them accept evil in its worse and madder forms in the guise of alternative or counterpositional parties under the pretext of making society more 'equal', which basically and gradually made women more equal to all the evils that had traditionally and rightfully opposed.

Thereafter, they were moved from choosing between evils to joining it, holding office within it, aspiring to head it, and heading it.

It was the first step toward the defeminisation of women as they compromised with evil by way of choosing between evils in elections, as opposed to purifying men so that they'd go out and get rid of such parties.

The purity of women, and its crucial role in rejuvenating men through love, empathy, compassion, and self-sacrifice so that men would experience enough cognitive and moral dissonance to be more sensitive to the evils in society, culture, and political parties, was thus eradicated by the so-called 'right to vote', and to be later completely eradicated via the invention yet another 'right' to work and become a 'more fulfilled career women' as is frequently extolled by the elite in western 'entertainment' and aped by the cultural inbreds of the western and westernised world. 

And one thing to note, much of the western (euro)Feminist movement was headed or promoted by women from relatively privilieged backgrounds.  They saw their husbands, fathers, go out to exploit the sons of other mothers, and feasted on the proceeds.  Thus, they lost their purity, their femininity, and therefore naturally sought to pursue 'equality' with their exploitative men so as to be able to exploit others.  They were, you could say, the first 'trans men', 'women in drag' so to speak.  

The elite, naturally, saw this as an opportunity to use such a movement to drag women out of the home, out of their morally-inspiring feminismity and maternalism, and end men as the thorn in their side from time immemorial.  And they have been pursuing this since then it all the evolutionary milestones of this thoroughly evil and misguided movement, through 'Prochoice' to 'LGBT'.  

Silly really. The more something is put forth as a 'right', the more one may want it, and then the more one is going to interpret not wanting it in the past, and throughout history, as proof of oppression.  All the devil needs to do is to turn evil into a matter of being 'deprived' of 'your rights' in order to promote and perpetuate wrongs.


WoEman

Different parts of the world saw various forms of this elitist conflict with women and the idea of femininity, with some having relatively greater success against the elite, like in India.

The Hindu wheel of life, its many denominations, the idea of interconnectedness with all living lives, viewing all life trees flowers rats cats and such as 'spirits without a voice or the ability to speak' (vai ilathe jeevan), the sacredness of the marital institution, the cult of the Mother and Mother Goddess, the relationships between mothers and child, etc, indicate a relatively greater advantage in the fight against elitist evils. 

In the west, they quickly moved from 'enfranchised women' - which was a prelude to turning them into corporate franchises - to career women, to promiscuous women, to debauched and depraved women who celebrated the destruction of religion, marriage, celebrated infanticide, and sexual depravity as evidence, as proof, of being free.  It basically made them worse then the worst of men some of them had complained about throughout history. Well done white folk.  What evils WON'T they think of next.

The Holy Family

It is no surprise that any evil elite, wanting to rule without the bane of women-inspired, defined, and rejuvenated male opposition to the elite will want to present the heterosexual marital relationship as elitist and attempt to destroy it by demonising men and 'freeing' women so that they can aspire to, or have 'the right' to be enslaved by the elite.... and call that a 'career'.  That effectively destroys the heterosexual family as the foundation for the emergence of all significant opposition to the elite.  It in effect destroys the very idea of Woman itself through the destruction of the idea of the family, man, gender, and through insidious and evil corporatist organisations like the 'Prochoice' movement, children themselves. 

When you can get rid of the family, you can get rid of, 'IN RELATION TO'.  You see, the dark gets its identity from the existence of the light. Hard gets its identity in contrast to soft.  Similarly, man, woman, child, get their identity from each other through the unconditionally loving, caring, and distinctive identities of Mother, Father, Brother, Sister, Uncle, Aunt, Grandmother, Grandfather, Niece, Nephew, Cousin, etc, and so on.  All these are different aspects of unconditional love and responsibility that is, 1. a CONTRAST to the the purely exploitative elitist, Corporatist evil, and 2. It is the means through which the best principles of all cultures, religions, philosophies, et cetera, expresses itself through.  Hence, to end the traditional heterosexual family is to end History itself and pave the way for a purely brazen automatonic society under the heel of the elite. That is insurrection of the highest and most heinous order.

The destruction of the family unit is in actual fact the destruction of history, as the family unit is the means, the prism, through which all the best elements of history, religion, philosophy, is expressed through, and transmitted.  The very ideas embedded within the identities of mother, father, brother, sister, parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, etc, transmits responsibilities, legacies, different types of love, relationships, expectations, etc, and interrelationships with community, society, and politics.  To destroy or pervert this is to destroy all opposition to the elite.  And the heart of this is the woman. Stop this, and it all ends.  

In china, for example, people are taught to kow tow to the emperor, and frequently refer to their 'leaders' as father or founding father.  In India, they are taught to kow tow to their parents, God, Mother, and Teacher, NEVER to the authorities.  And it is in the latter that the elite have to be wary as their evil belligerence is checked on by the feminine influence of love and self-sacrifice on the family, and which is a standard against which all is judged.  Such a standard does not exist amongst the chinese race, and is highly diluted amongst the Europeans. Any wonder why both the chinese and Europeans are the most belligerent, murderous, and self-serving races?  Any wonder why the European eats raw meat and the chinese 'anything that moves' whilst most in India are vegetarian? Those are the dismal regions where the mother is the most defeminised in favour of the elite.


SUM =

Man. Woman. It was such a division of labour, gender, a heavenly agenda, that saw women being ultimately mothers and nurturers, and the ultimate nurturers of humanity, and the real generals in the war for heaven against hell through their unconditional love and self-sacrifice.

And that is what had been saving culture, civilisation, humanity from becoming completely mutually alienated, antagonistic, purely economic, sexual, and primitive, and therefore ultimately, being owned and disposed of at the will of the evil elite.  In other words, women stopped humanity from becoming carnivorous as all would be if they acquired self-definition within an elitist system as opposed to a daily renaissance of their spirit within the Holy Family.

The incorporation of women into the corporation wasn't the end of patriarchy as is commonly thought of in the culturally inbred and abjectly wilfully irrationally eurocentric west.  Rather, what we are witnessing is the utter subsumption of society INTO patriarchy, or more accurately, Corporatism, with the transference of the maternal, familial, and nurturing tendency from the Holy Family to the far from holy Corporation.  That is when children, will have no maternal wifely feminine contrast to the evil of the elite,  and will be toward one and all as they are treated themselves.  And that is when evil will rule in perpetuity and for civilisation, that will be, 

The End


edX