There is no such thing as 'homophobia'

It is simply a case of the west attempting to promote something perverse across the globe, and calling you a bigot if you don't open your mouth and say 'ahhh'. They think that simply attaching the term 'phobia' to the end of something they want to promote renders your culture and opposition irrelevant and illegitimate.

So how about people who hate homosexuals and perhaps get violent with them? What do we refer to them as? Simple - 'guilty of criminal intimidation' and 'grevious bodily harm', and all such variants.

Such attacks aren't similar to racial attacks. A race isn't a 'fetish'. We must stand against violent attacks against anyone for their fetish or perversion, but we shouldn't confuse it for standing up for the fetish or perversion itself.

If we keep bowing down to everything the west wants us to do, we will end up accepting every fetish of theirs - arising from their overly-sexualised and grossly shallow and consumeristic society.

Once, we resisted their colonial capitalist enterprise, and they called us 'savages'. They called us savages for being one with nature, not exploiting the land or each other as much like they did, not having big cities, not wearing much clothes (because it was hot you dumbasses), for being communal as opposed to self-serving narcissistic beasts. Now that people have donned suits and ties across the globe for 'respectability', even to ridiculous degrees in sweltering climates, they expect the same of us in everything. Feck off.

We have our ancient civilisations, wisdoms, profound religions and cultural practices, the likes of which they never had, and probably never will - though they did aspire to it during their 'hippie' movement, but fecked it up with the likes of morons like Lennon, and their thinking that getting stoned and having sex indiscriminately was the path to Nirvana...what a bunch of twits. Are we to give up the best elements of the totality of all our various cultural standards, wisdoms, religions, histories, and let them decide what is 'conservative', what is 'liberal', what is 'enlightened' as well?

No, we should not discriminate against homosexuals. But we should not be giving the thumbs-up to everything they come up with simply because they say so. Let us tolerate perversions, but let's not confuse this toleration for acceptance and normalisation.

The west's homosexuality-promoting 'freedom to love' campaign is insidious. Their equation is, you're and adult, therefore your choices are fine, so long as it does not contravene the basic laws of not killing or stealing. They have forgotten that what makes an adult is the right choices, as opposed to your choices being right because you're an adult.

The fact that they can classify movies as 'adult', not for its intelligent and insightful content, but for its sexual brazeness, absolutely sick and twisted gore and slaughter, already proves that their idea of 'adult' should be appreciated as one examines a virus behind doors marked with the biohazard symbol.

The effort to protect a person's right to sin can only be seen as a virtue - as it protects our right to do what we want - if this effort is accompanied by an effort to promote virtues despite our sins - because it protects our potential to do what is right.

This 'freedom to love' pogrom against global cultural variations opens the door to sexual debauchery to the fullest. In fact, their LGBT movement is an attack against all ancient cultures that attempt to make more of us despite our darker potentials.  By forcibly promoting their sexual depravity on children and the world, they are undermining our cultures at the root level, because when you introduces sexual depravity, all other elements of our cultures, like aspiring to more than all our base desires, are immediately undermined.  And with that, a whole Pandora's Box is opened up, validating all sorts of evils as acts we ought to engage in, or accept, if we want to 'feel free'.

With their 'what an adult does = ok, because it is between consenting adults' equation, incest, and all forms of sexual depravity, adultery, etc, is also justified in principle. And when this is finally given the go-ahead in the west, and they call you a bigot and an incestophobe for being against it, we will finally have arrived at the conclusion of their capitalistic colonial enterprise of being consumers to the core. To prepare the path for the final degeneration of humanity, from economic consumers of products to people, it is sealed with people becoming consumers of people, short of cannibalism.

It may be a virtue to protect a person's right to sin, but it does not render the sin a virtue.

The effort to protect a person's right to sin can only be seen as a virtue - as it protects our right to do what we want - if this effort is accompanied by an effort to promote virtues despite our sins - because it protects our potential to do what is right.

Strange isn't it.  Once upon a time, to NOT be a bigot was for the purpose of encouraging our better natures.  Now, to the west, to not be a bigot is for the purpose of encouraging our worst potentials.

The western/white approach toward the idea of 'freedom' confuses the protection of one's right to sin as the sole virtue, and thus gives the green light to all perversions.   In fact, it comes across as if one isn't completely free unless one engages in it, or thinks it alright to do so.   If not, one is a bigot.

Strange isn't it.  Once upon a time, to NOT be a bigot was for the purpose of encouraging our better natures.  Now, to the west, to not be a bigot is for the purpose of encouraging our worst potentials from infanticide to sexual depravity.  That, to them, is the greatest evidence of freedom, and the greatest exercise of virtue. In other words, you must have the freedom to sin, and sinning is the evidence that you are free. That is the basis of their whole approcah toward morality.

I will protect anyone's right to sin, but i will be damned before i normalise or promote it as virtue. It is the conflict between what we feel like doing and what we ought to do that is the foundations of adulthood.



edX